[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 大家好，欢迎参加今晚的社区会议，以改造公交网络。 我叫里根，查一下，我将担任今晚会议的主持人。 下一张幻灯片。 我想指出的是，MBTA 的所有活动，包括公开会议，都没有歧视。 MBTA 符合所有联邦、州和民权要求，防止基于种族、肤色、国籍、有限英语水平和其他受保护特征的歧视。 我们欢迎整个服务领域的多样性。 如果您有任何问题或疑虑，请访问 mbta.com，斜线，第六章，即第六章，联系多元化和民权办公室。 下一张幻灯片。 我也想提醒大家参加这次会议的规则，并提醒大家，会议正在录音。 虽然我们希望能够亲自举行这次会议，但我们希望我们设计了一个互动的在线公开会议，让我们有机会共同交谈。 在我们开始这次对话之前，我想回顾一下 Zoom 平台的一些技术方面。 下一张幻灯片。 今晚的会议我们有美国手语口译员。 如果您想始终查看 ASL 解释器，请将显示设置保持在图库模式。 要固定艺术家的视频，请单击艺术家视频右上角的省略号，然后选择“固定视频”。 每次我们更换口译员时，您都必须重复此过程。 今晚我们还有一名口译员将会议翻译成西班牙语和普通话。 如果您需要这些服务，请单击屏幕上的翻译按钮、地球图标，然后选择您想听到的语言。 另外，让我们保持较小的规模。 呃，这个会议稍后讨论，按地区开会。 如果您想参加西班牙语或普通话的讨论，请在聊天中向项目团队成员发送消息，以便我们届时引导您进入适当的讨论部分。 此时，我会要求所有说英语的人选择英语作为他们选择的语言。 这将使您在问答过程中听到英语以外语言的翻译评论。下一张幻灯片。 您可以通过单击字幕功能并选择显示的选项之一来查看字幕。 显示标题将在屏幕底部显示标题。 查看完整记录将在右侧窗口中显示会议的音频记录。 下一张幻灯片。 演示期间所有参与者均静音，以避免过多的背景噪音。 如果您在计算机上观看此会议，请更改演讲者视图以更明显地查看演示文稿。 如果您使用的是智能手机，请滑动以更改视图。 您可以在会议期间随时使用聊天按钮提交书面问题或评论。 聊天尚未开放，但如果您直接提出问题，我们将收到评论和问题。 我们将在演示期间监控聊天，但我们要求您保存所有重要的评论和问题，以供会议稍后的讨论或问答环节使用。 如果您有技术问题，请在会议期间随时在聊天中分享，我们将尽快回复。 我会注意到，所有项目团队成员都会在参与者列表中的姓名旁边显示项目团队。 那么，您提交的问题一旦提交，与会者将看不到它们，但我们会在会议的问答部分尝试尽可能多地回答。 在分组讨论期间，每个人都可以看到聊天内容，我们建议您尊重其他参与者的所有聊天评论。 如果您使用不当语言，您将被从会议中除名。 如果您遇到技术问题，请在会议期间在聊天中分享。 现在，毕竟，我想介绍 MBTA 的贾斯汀·安托斯 (Justin Antos)。 他是巴士转型的高级总监，并将发表一些开场白。 贾斯汀？
[Unidentified]: 谢谢你，雷加纳。
[Justin Antos]: 晚安。 正如里根所说，我的名字是贾斯汀·安托斯。 我是 T 的公交改造总监。我很高兴今晚能在这里启动这次重新设计公交网络的会议。 我为什么兴奋？ 因为公共交通对该地区的经济至关重要，尤其是在大流行之后，MBTA 巴士为我们最依赖公共交通的人群提供服务。 MBTA 上的巴士出行在新冠疫情期间是最具弹性的，并且在今天仍然最强。 比许多铁路服务。 但我们地区近几年和几十年来发生了巨大变化，我们的公交网络必须迎接挑战并随之改变。 T 的公交网络必须适应人们当今出行的方式、地点和时间。 五月份，我们发布了一个地图项目、一项服务提案，并在整个去年夏天，包括今年秋天，我们收到了超过 20,000 条关于此问题的公众评论。 我们已经审查了所有这些评论。 我们都读了。 在过去的几个月里，我们与市、县、居民、民选官员、邻里团体举行了数十次会议。 我们在此期间表示，我们将根据您的反馈对我们的服务主张做出重大改变。 今晚我们在这里向您介绍我们所做的改变、我们所听到的以及我们正在采取的行动。 现在，请注意，该提案的公众评议期已经结束。 今晚我们的目标是解释我们所听到的内容以及我们如何改变它作为回应。 我们对整个项目的目标保持不变。 我们仍然需要创建更好的公交网络，为乘客提供更公平的服务， 通过创建连接更多地点的更频繁的路线来改造整个公交系统。 我们该怎么做？ 好吧，我们通过增加服务来做到这一点。 完成后，我们仍计划将整个网络的服务增加 25%。 我们正面临巴士运营商的招聘短缺，但我们有计划应对。 我们还计划为数十万乘客提供更频繁的服务。 这是一种高频服务，我们将其定义为每周 7 天、全天每 15 分钟左右停一站的公交车。 但为了做出这些改进，我们必须做出妥协并考虑改变。 我们无法完成所有要求的更改，但我们最终对您今晚将听到的服务提案中约三分之二的路线进行了更改。 因此，我相信我们现在提出的修订后的网络地图对于当前和未来的用户来说是一个更好的计划和更公平的公交系统，以更频繁的服务、更可靠的服务和更好的连接性反映了不断变化的出行需求。 我只想说声谢谢作为结束。 感谢您今晚来到这里帮助我们建立更好的公交网络。 这是我们的公交系统。 这不是 MBTA 巴士系统。 这不只是你的。 这里的每个人，包括我，包括今晚在座的所有 MBTA 人，都乘坐公共汽车，我们非常关心它。 现在回到项目经理道格·约翰逊。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 谢谢你，贾斯蒂诺。 大家好，感谢今晚加入我们。 正如贾斯汀提到的，我叫道格·约翰逊，是公交网络重新设计项目经理。 今晚的会议将首先简要介绍公交网络的重新设计以及对我们五月份发布的提案所做的更改。 正如贾斯汀提到的，正如您所知，我们在五月份发布了一份网络地图草稿，并请求公众对其发表评论。 9月份，我们终于收到了超过20,000条关于提案草案的评论，并将这些评论纳入了我们今晚将向大家展示的修订后的网络地图中。 我将概述已做出的更改，然后我们将进入分组讨论室，项目团队成员将在其中介绍对网络特定区域所做的更改。 在这些分组讨论室中，您将有机会询问有关所做更改的问题。 大约 40 分钟后，我们将返回 Zoom 主会议室进行问答。 在问答环节开始时，我们将首先请民选官员发表评论。 如果您无法参加整个会议，但想留下有关修改后的公交网络的反馈，您可以在聊天中发表评论，我们会将其添加到我们的记录中，或者您也可以通过我们的在线反馈表提交评论。 此表单的链接将发布在聊天中。 人们可能熟悉更好的公交项目，但我将简要概述该项目以及公交网络重新设计如何融入其中。 Better Bus Project 是 MBTA 的一系列综合项目，旨在对整个公交系统进行改造和现代化，以创造更可靠的服务和更好的用户体验。 它包括重新设计公交网络、持续努力实现公交车维护设施现代化和车队脱碳， 建设公交网络优先基础设施，使所有公交站点无障碍，在公交站点提供更多服务，如候车亭、长凳和照明，改善向乘客提供有关公交车、何时到达站点以及路线变更的信息。 以及改变 MBTA 在我们系统上收费的方式。 重新设计公交网络是这一更大努力的一部分，并为其他努力提供信息，告诉我们公交车服务将在哪里、何时进行、我们需要多少运营商、我们需要多少辆公交车、新的公交车站需要位于哪里、以及我们需要在哪里安装公交优先权、公交专用道和公共交通车辆专用的红绿灯等。 因此，公交网络重新设计项目旨在重新构想整个公交网络，以更好地反映该地区当前的需求。 众所周知，近年来和几十年来，该地区发生了很大变化。 人们生活在曾经是工业区。 这里有一些一两年前还不存在的新就业中心。 此前，出行模式因新冠疫情而发生了变化，并且在新冠疫情之前也发生了变化。 但现有的公交网络并不能很好地满足人们想去哪里以及何时去的需求和出行模式。 大约 50 年来，公交网络没有发生太大变化。 这就是为什么这项工作寻求重新设计它以更好地满足该地区的需求，以便我们能够提供服务 在人们想去的时间到达他们想去的地方，我们提供频繁、可靠的服务。 一个很好的例子，如您所知，目前公交网络非常专注于在一周内的早上和晚上提供服务。 但显然人们整天、每天都在旅行，不仅仅是为了 一周内早上和晚上工作。 人们有不同类型的日程安排和不同的旅行原因。
[Adam Hurtubise]: 我们希望确保公交网络满足所有这些需求。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: Our first goal is to create a more equitable network. This is about providing more service and more reliable service to the people who are the most dependent on public transit, including low-income populations, households with few or no vehicles, seniors, people with disabilities, and communities of color that do not have equal access to public transit. We want to create more frequent service in busy neighborhoods, more all day service, service that runs all day, every day, whether it's a weekday or a weekend, and is frequent and reliable regardless of the time of day. We want to create new connections to more places, including all those non-downtown job centers that exist now that didn't exist a decade or two ago. We want to make the network simpler and easier to use. As folks know, right now, sometimes if you get on a bus, it may not go to the same place it usually goes to, depending on the time of day or the day of the week. We want to make sure that the network is easier to navigate and that routes do consistent things so that you don't have to worry about what time of day it is or what day of the week it is, whether that bus is going to get you home or not. We want the network to be consistent and reliable enough that folks can show up to a bus stop without having to check the schedule to confirm that that bus is going to come on time or get them to where they need to go. We also want to implement more transit priority, as I mentioned, and other infrastructure across the network to improve reliability and accessibility. Many of the bus stops in the current network are not accessible. They're not compliant with the American with Disabilities Act. and there are a lot of challenges for folks who are trying to use the bus network at those locations. These are things that we seek to address through this effort as part of our overall goal of transforming and improving the bus network. We've developed a revised network proposal using service design principles and the public feedback that we collected over the summer and the fall. In general, our principles are to prioritize frequency over one-seat rides, create more rapid transit connections and more crosstown routes, focus on all-day service, combine routes to create high-frequency corridors, minimize route variations, and minimize deviations on high-frequency routes. But service design principles only get us so far, of course, and so does the analysis of quantitative data. That's the cell phone data that we use to develop the initial network and other metrics like ridership and things that can be quantified or counted. We know that that alone is not enough to design a bus network. Public feedback is a really important component and has to be incorporated into the network to ensure that it actually meets people's needs. We told everyone at the beginning of this process that we would make meaningful changes to the draft network based on the feedback that we received and we have. The revised bus network would still increase service by 25% across the network versus pre pandemic service. we would still double the number of high-frequency corridors. Those are buses coming every 15 minutes or better, all day, seven days a week. And when we say 15 minutes or better, the goal is for that to be the worst that that service would be. Some routes would come every four minutes during rush hour, or every six minutes, or every eight minutes. There are routes in the network today that come that frequently during rush hour, and that we do not intend to change. But what we want to do is make sure that those really frequent routes are really frequent all day, every day. The existing key bus routes that we have Those are our most frequent routes, their frequency varies in during peak periods is when they are most frequent. Their frequency is more consistent than other routes in the network, but it is still less frequent midday and on weekends. The map on the left on this slide shows the key bus routes. The map on the right shows the new high-frequency corridors that would be created by this plan. You can see that communities like Chelsea, Everett, Medford, Malden, Lynn, Waltham, South Boston, Roxbury, Dorchester, West Roxbury, Quincy, many of these communities gain high frequency service that they don't have today. So this is really about creating a network that provides more equitable service across the region and better service for everyone who uses buses. Based on the feedback that we received over the summer and the fall, we ended up making changes to about two thirds of the routes in the proposal. We changed 85 of 133 routes. The changes that we made range from things like making small changes to routes to making complete changes to routes, including taking routes that exist today and putting them back in the proposal as they exist today or pre-pandemic. So the types of changes really range from those small changes, depending on the feedback, to wholesale changes to routes. And I'll talk more about those in the next few slides. And then the facilitators and breakout rooms will walk through each route in the respective area that that breakout room is associated with and talk about those changes. There were five main reasons why we made changes. The first was to respond to public feedback that we received on the draft map. The second was to improve access to hospitals, senior centers, grocery stores, shopping malls, and other destinations. The third was to reduce the walk distances, specifically for seniors, riders with disabilities, and riders with mobility challenges, and especially in locations with really challenging terrain or pedestrian conditions. I mentioned the service design principles earlier, where we said we wanted to focus on more frequent service and combining services so that they'd be more frequent. The trade off with doing that is that there are situations in which we would be asking folks to walk further to get to a bus stop than they have to walk today in order to have a much better service. We heard a lot of feedback about that specifically from folks on the draft map. And we looked at those situations where folks said that increased walking distance would be a hardship and a barrier to accessing the service for them. So we took that feedback to heart and we adjusted many of our routes to reduce those walking distances in situations where folks told us it would be too much of a hardship or barrier to accessing the service. The fourth reason was to preserve some existing one seat rides to certain destinations. In the draft network, one of the things that we were doing was creating a network of really high frequency routes. But a trade-off with that is that in some cases, a route that you have today, that's a one-seat ride, meaning you get on a bus, it takes you from point A to point B without you having to transfer or get on a different bus. That's a one-seat ride. In the draft network that we had proposed, there were some situations where existing one-seat rides would be broken up into a two-seat ride. So you would have to transfer from one service to another. If those two routes are very frequent and very reliable, then it won't impact your travel time very much to have to make that transfer. But we know that there are locations where transferring from one service to another can be really challenging or can be a big increase in the amount of time that you're spending getting from point A to point B. So we've reviewed all the feedback that we received a lot of feedback about that specifically. And we took a really close look at that and ultimately decided that in some situations, It was better to put a route, a one seat ride back into the network. And I think a good example of that is the route 39 from Jamaica Plain to Copley and Back Bay. We had proposed the 39 going from Jamaica Plain into Cambridge. but we heard a lot of feedback on it and decided ultimately to revert it back to what it does today. So the 39 would continue to do what it does today. If folks want to travel to Cambridge from JP, there are other options in this new network for them to transfer from the 39 to our new 47 or other routes, but that's an example where we put back what exists in the network today because of the feedback that we got. And then the fifth reason for changes were to balance our resources and stay within the limits that bound us. There are a maximum number of buses that we can run at any given time. Without increasing the size of the fleet, we can't go beyond that current limit. There's also a maximum amount of service hours revenue vehicle hours that we can run and stay within our budget. So that is a hard limit as well, and we had to stay within that it's still a 25% increase over the pre-pandemic amount of service that we were providing, and I want to be clear on that. We will be providing 25% more service versus what we were providing pre-pandemic, not today. Obviously, as folks know, there is less service provided today because of operator shortage challenges that we are facing right now. So those were limits that we had to stay within. So we were not able to make every single change that was requested of us, but we did our best to respond to as much of the public feedback as we possibly could and really make this a much better network based on the feedback that we received. There are five main categories for types of changes that were made. The first was restoring existing route either to what it does today either in whole or in part. I'll give you a few examples on this list. The 39 I already mentioned will continue to do what it does today going from Jamaica Plain to Copley and Back Bay. We put part of the 47 back but then also extended the 47 in different ways so it looks slightly different than it does today. The 55 will continue to do what it does today. We have proposed the 55 going to Kendall rather than going from Fenway to Copley, but we heard a lot of feedback on it, and the 55 will continue to do what it does today. I want to be clear that it will not go to Park Street as it did in the past, but it will continue to do what it does today. The 87 and the 89 are routes that we made changes to in response to the feedback that we received. The 201, the 202 are back to in this network doing what they do today. So we rescinded the alternate proposal that we have for those routes. The 354 was not included in the initial proposal that we released in May. That is back in this new network providing express service from Burlington and Woburn down 93 to Medford Square and into downtown. And then the 505 we had proposed a modification to its routing. We reverted it back to the routing that it has today due to feedback from City of Needham. So, excuse me, Newton. That's the first category of changes. The second was rerouting routes, making small changes to routes to better connect to medical facilities, senior housing, and other destinations. This is a major theme that we heard in the public feedback. routes like the T8 and the T12. And I wanna note here that the letter T in front of a number means that that will be a high frequency route. It will come every 15 minutes or better all day from 5 a.m. to 1 a.m. seven days a week. In some cases, those routes are even more frequent during rush hours. So the T8 and the T12, we modified to better connect to Boston Medical Center. the 11 will continue to serve Tufts Medical Center directly. In the draft proposal, we had proposed the 11 stopping at the Broadway red line station. But based on feedback that we got from folks, we decided to extend the 11 to Tufts Medical Center. It won't do exactly what it does today. It won't loop through downtown and down A street, but it will go from South Boston to Tufts Medical Center and back directly. Other routes like the T-104, that will do something very different than what it does today. It will still start at Malden Center, but it will go to East Boston through Everett and Chelsea. We modified that proposal to better serve the grocery store in Chelsea, the Market Basket, and to connect to the airport Blue Line station. You can see the other routes on this list where there were other small route modifications made to that May proposal in response to this feedback that we got. The third category was adding routes to the proposal that were not in the proposal for May. The 113 is a brand new route that we've added that goes from Chelsea to Assembly Row by way of Everett Square. That was a change we made in relation to some other changes, the 90 in Somerville. The 47, I mentioned, is a route we've reintroduced, it will continue to do partly what it does today, but not the entirety of what it does today. If you join the breakout room that covers Cambridge, and the surrounding municipalities you'll hear more about that route. The fourth category of changes was frequency and span adjustments. So that's how often a bus comes and then span is the time, the hours of the day that it runs. So those are routes where we adjusted the frequency and span but we didn't adjust the route. And a good example of that is the 504, where we've added some midday service to it, and the SL2. We had proposed making the SL2 peak period only, basically rush hour only on weekdays, but the SL2 will now be a high frequency route seven days a week. And then the last category were routes that were included in the May proposal that are not in a revised network. An example of this is the Route 20. We had proposed the Route 20 to do what the 201 and 202 do to some extent. Because we have restored the 201 and the 202, we have rescinded this proposal for the Route 20. So there were a handful of other routes where that was the case. The 350 is an example. We have reintroduced to some extent the Route 80, but now the 80 in this new network will do what we have proposed for the 350, as well as providing a connection between Arlington Center and Somerville that is not covered by the Green Line extension. So there were a small number of routes that had been in the proposal that were removed because of other changes that we made in the network. So those are the main categories. You will hear the actual details of these changes and see maps in the breakout rooms that we'll move to shortly. The revised bus network is now publicly available. You can go to the project website, which is mbta.com slash BNRD. On the project website, there is a list of all the changes made to the May 2022 proposal, both an interactive map and a static PDF map that you can look at. And there's a link to the online comment form where folks can leave comments about the revised bus network. All of your comments will be shared with the Bus Transformation Office, which is tasked with implementation of the new network. We are also conducting an equity analysis of the revised bus network. That is underway right now and will be completed by December. That is required of us by the FTA, or it's required of all transit agencies by the FTA when an agency wants to make changes that surpass a certain threshold. Because we are redesigning the entire network, we surpass that threshold and we are required to conduct this equity analysis. There will be a public meeting for that, the results of that equity analysis to present it to the public this winter. The changes that we are proposing to the bus network are not going to happen overnight. We anticipate that it will take a total of five years to implement this new network. It will be done in phases as our bus operator headcount allows, beginning in the summer of 2023. Changes will likely be made with the summer service changes each year between 2023 and 2027. There are also a number of capital projects or construction projects that will need to take place in order to make this new network possible. We are in the process of identifying new stop locations where existing stops that are not accessible will need to either be upgraded or relocated so that they can be accessible, as well as where transit priority infrastructure will need to be implemented in order to allow the service to maintain the reliability that we want it to have. Those are things, as I mentioned, like bus lanes and dedicated traffic signals specifically for buses. If you're familiar with the Green Line, you know that the Green Line, the B branch, C branch, D and E, when they're in the roadway or on the surface, there are dedicated signals for them at intersections. So that is something that we will be implementing across the network for buses in places where we want to make bus service more reliable or have it have dedicated roadway space or exclusive time in a signal phase. The work to identify all of those projects and those locations is underway right now. And we are working on a plan to both address the operator shortage that we and many transit agencies across the country are experiencing, as well as the implications for that with the implementation phasing that we are planning right now. That concludes this overview presentation. Before we move to breakout rooms, I just want to say, or leave these resources here for a moment so that folks have the project website, you can see it's the first address there, mbta.com slash BNRD. The online feedback form, you can find it on the project website or you can use the link mbta.com slash BNRD feedback that will take you directly to that online feedback form. And you can learn more about the Bettered Bus project at that project website, mbta.com slash Bettered Bus. Of course, you can continue to email the MBTA as well, your questions and comments. I'll now turn it back over to Regan Cecchio, who will go over how the breakout rooms will work.
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，道格拉斯。 因此，正如您提到的，我们将进行一些区域分组讨论，以回答您有关修订后地图的问题。 道格，你可以翻到下一张幻灯片吗？ 所以， 在屏幕上，我将大声朗读它们，以便口译员的阅读。 您可以看到有按县划分的团体房间的交叉引用。 那么，会议室 1。 这是第一，贝弗利，切尔西，丹弗斯，东波士顿。 埃弗里特、林恩、林菲尔德、马尔登、马布尔黑德、梅尔罗斯、纳汉特。 皮博迪、雷丁、里维尔、塞勒姆、索格斯、斯托纳姆、斯旺斯科特、韦克菲尔德和温思罗普。 休息室二号，阿灵顿、贝德福德、伯灵顿、剑桥、列克星敦、梅德福、萨默维尔、温彻斯特、沃本。 3 号休息室位于波士顿和布鲁克莱恩。 休息室 4 位于贝尔蒙特、尼达姆、牛顿、沃尔瑟姆、沃特敦。 5 号休息室是 Avon、Braintree、Brockton、Canton、Dedham、Hingham、Holbrook、Hull、Milton、Norwood、Quincy、Randolph、Walpole、Westwood、Weymouth。 感谢您在我查看这些房间时的耐心等待，我要指出的是，虽然这些房间是按市政路线列出的，但它们显然跨越了市政边界。 然后加入最适合您兴趣的房间。 每个休息室，嗯。 我们将有一位组长，他将提供网络更新的简要概述。 然后他们将可以回答您的问题和答案。 关于修改后的地图。 如果您想参观多个主题房间，可以随时更换房间。 您必须离开该房间，前往主房间，然后返回另一个休息室。 当您选择休息室时，您将查找休息室号码。 我们尝试将一些城市纳入命名约定，但有点难以融入。 然后寻找第一、第二、第三、第四、第五。 我现在要向协调员和记录员指出，我们实际上无法自动将他们分配到他们的房间。 因此，当我们开放分组讨论室时，请尽快加入您的会议室。 所以你必须自己做。 向团队道歉。 阿曼达，你能暂停录音吗？ 录音已停止，Doug，您想继续吗？ 第720章 是的。 出色地。 我们将在休息室待 40 分钟。 因此，即使幻灯片上写着 715，我们也会在那里呆到 720，然后在 720 时我们会带您回到主房间并进行问答。 如果您在选择要加入的分组讨论室时遇到任何困难，只需在聊天中输入您想要加入的房间，我们就可以将您转移到该房间。
[Unidentified]: 阿曼达，你能打开休息室吗？ 好的，所以每个人都应该能够进入他们的房间。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 道格，你可以停止屏幕共享。
[Adam Hurtubise]: Vou deixar isso ativo momentaneamente para que as pessoas vejam caso eu precise revisar o.
[Unidentified]: Hi, everyone. This is Melissa Dulé from the MBTA. We'll just give another minute. I see folks are still signing themselves to this particular breakout room. So we'll start shortly. This is breakout room number two. We will be covering root changes in Arlington, Bedford, Burlington, Cambridge, Lexington, Lincoln, Medford, Somerville, Winchester, and Woburn. Let's get started. My name is Melissa Dulé, and I'm the Senior Director of Service Planning. I'll be walking through the changes that we made to the draft bus network redesign map. As Doug mentioned in the first part of the presentation, we made meaningful changes to the network map based on the feedback that we received. A note about order, I'm largely going to present these in numeric order, but there are some routes that are interrelated, so occasionally I may go out of order when there are related route changes. We made a number of changes, restoring existing routes in whole or in part. I've shown a subset of the routes that we'll be covering today here. So this is a little bit different than the slide that Doug showed earlier. Sometimes we've made route changes to better serve medical facilities or senior housing or other destinations at the request of municipalities and others. Sometimes we've added new routes back into the proposed. Sometimes we've made frequency or span adjustments. So the first batch of routes that I'll be talking about relates to the initial proposal for the T39, but that also affects T47 and T96. So the next slides I'll present together. The former proposal was to connect the T39 from Jamaica Plain to Longwood Medical, Boston University, Cambridge, and Somerville, ultimately ending at Porter Square in Cambridge. But we heard that the route was too long. This is something that we'd heard from the public, from elected officials, and even during our operator in-reach events, we'd heard that our bus operators were concerned with the route's length and the availability of restroom access for such a long route. Also, some of the other things that we'd heard, Jamaica Plain in particular, wanted direct service to Copley. And there is the history there with the former Arborway Greenline service providing that direct connection. So that was important to maintain. In Cambridge, the city was concerned with the ability to carve out layover space at Porter Square, given some of the protected bike infrastructure that has gone in. Summerville residents had noted that there was no direct connection between Davis Square and Union Square that had required a transfer between the T-96 and the T-39 in our original proposal. So synthesizing all this different feedback that we'd received on many different aspects, We end up with the revised proposal as shown. The T39 on the left side would retain its direct service to Copley like it does now, and this would replace our initial proposal that had gone all the way up through Cambridge into Union Square and Porter Square. On the left, you can see that we're proposing we would get that connectivity between Union Square and Cambridge, Cambridge Port, Boston University, and Ruggles with a new route, T47. So this is similar to today's 47 bus, but the route is a little different. So this would start actually a little bit beyond Union Square. near the future East Somerville station that will be opening on the Green Line extension later this year. And it would only go as far as Ruggles. We have other services that would serve Broadway station and Albany Street and other portions of today's Route 47. And this would be a T47 route, meaning that it would be a high frequency service. It would be every 15 minutes or better, seven days a week from 5 a.m. to 1 a.m. And that gets the connectivity that we were really looking for, getting folks in Cambridge and Somerville to job opportunities at the Longwood Medical Area, to opportunities for patient care, and also to the BU area, while still allowing that transfer to the T39 for folks who are interested in continuing out to Jamaica Plain and Forest Hills. On the next slide, I can show you how we also made some changes to T96. I had mentioned one of the things that we'd heard from Somerville in particular was interest in extending a one-seat ride with high frequency between Davis Square and Union Square, two very important squares within Somerville. So by sliding where the T39 and the T96 connect, except now that it's the T47, we slid that connection point to Union Square. So what that means is that there would now be high frequency service directly between Davis and Union on the new T96. So this relates to the changes to the T39 that I had mentioned. But at the same time, we also have another different unrelated route change on the Medford portion of the T96 as well. We heard from many riders of the T96 along Winthrop Street, that would be over here, and George Street on the former proposal to keep service on College Ave, that would create a hardship for them. The walk out to College Ave was just too far, this is College Ave over here, for the volume of riders there. In the revised proposal, the T96 would serve High Street, from Medford Square to Winthrop Circle, and would travel down Winthrop Street to George Street, meaning that we're able to provide direct high-frequency service to some existing Route 94 riders along High Street here, and also to cut down that walk distance for the folks who had written us coming from George Street or folks coming from Winthrop Street in the Medgar Hillside area. The next package of changes relates to bus route 55. The 55 had been proposed as a combination of today's CT2 and 55 and provided local connectivity to the West Fens neighborhood via transfer at a future accessible Heinz station, while also connecting Kendall Square and the Red Line to the Longwood Medical Area. But we heard from residents in the West Fens, including many seniors, that they really valued that direct connection to Copley Square. So we've split apart our proposal into the 55 to Copley with an 85 bus that serves the function of the CT2 for Kendall and Longwood trips. We're retiring the CT2 nomenclature and instead using the 85 numbers in its place. have another map that shows a little bit more of the 85 also. So we would continue to serve Kendall Square, the Port neighborhood in Cambridge, Union Square, And instead of Avon Street in Spring Hill, like the 85 uses today to turn around, due to planned roadway changes in Somerville, we would instead provide a north-south connection between Union Square and Assembly, which is something that we'd heard requested multiple times during our outreach earlier this summer. Next we have Route 64. As in our original proposal, we're looking to extend the route to Kendall Square on all days of the week so that there would be a consistent service pattern, unlike today's service, which only goes to Kendall on weekdays. And we also have two changes on the Boston end of the route to maintain service to North Beacon Street due to significant development plans. And also to not show that the route would serve future West Station, which is slated to open after our five-year implementation window. It currently looks like West Station is slated for about 10 years out. So we're continuing to show, at least for the short term, that the 64 would do what it does today on this stretch through Austin. Next we have route 74. This is probably one of the biggest concerns that we had heard within Cambridge was the loss of frequency on Concord Ave. We did not have the route 74 on the initial map, which only had the routes 75 and 78. But with the amount of development slated for the area, including low income housing, which is expected to attract significant transit trips, and also the existing residential employment and retail opportunities along Concord Ave and near Fresh Pond Circle, we've added the Route 74 back in. This would also have new Sunday service compared to today's service because the 74 only operates Mondays through Saturdays. At the Belmont end of the route, we also are showing a small route change. We're showing the route continuing to Belmont Center under the railroad bridge. This would not be possible now with the posted low clearance, but we have some ideas for intersection changes that would allow the posted bridge height to be revised in a way that would allow for restored bus service under the bridge and into Belmont Center. Next, we have Route 76. One concern we'd heard about this route, which goes out to the Hanscom Civil Air Terminal in Bedford and to Lincoln Lab and through Lexington and into ALF, was that we had proposed only operating peak period service, and we'd instead upgraded the sort of companion Route 62 to be a seven-day service, but that was something that was causing a hardship that we'd heard about during our initial outreach. So we have restored midday service on the Route 76 while still having the 62 upgraded to seven-day service. We also heard about concern about the lack of service along Acorn Park Drive in Cambridge off of Route 2, which is served by today's inbound route. This serves a number of office parks and other developments, and we have added that Acorn Park Drive portion of the route back into both the routes 62 and the 76. There was also a concern from Lincoln Lab riders that they were being forced to take a longer trip via the Hanscom Civil Air terminal for their connections. The intention is that we would serve Lincoln Lab and Hanscom only once per round trip, like we do today, and that we would go outbound in the mornings to Lincoln Lab first, then inbound from Hanscom, and then reverse that for the PM. That gives the most direct trips to the most number of riders without folks having to kind of take a lengthy detour through the other portion of the route. And then lastly, there was a concern in Lexington about the loss of service to Lexington Center, which provides either better frequency to the portion of the route where it overlaps with the 62, or also serves a small stretch over near the high school, just to the west of Mass Ave. By rerouting the 62 on a slightly longer routing, we're able to serve Lexington Center, get better frequency to that important town center in Lexington, allow for transfer opportunities to the Lexpress routes that the town of Lexington operates, and get that connection to the high school that folks are looking for. So those are the changes to Route 76. Next we have Route 80. One of the pieces that we had heard that was missing from our original map proposal was a connection from Arlington to the Medford Greenline Extension Bridge. In the original proposal, we had not included Route 80 at all due to substantial overlaps between Route 80 and the Medford-Tufts branch of the Green Line that's slated to open later this year. In the revised proposal, we restore the Route 80 connection from Arlington Center, here, to Boston Ave and Medford-Tufts Green Line Extension Station. And from there, we continue to Davis Square for our Red Line connection. This also becomes the primary Boston Ave connection here in Medford, which replaces the proposed 94 that had formerly been on Boston Ave in our initial proposal, and which I have a slide on later. At the outer end of the Route 80, We continue the route from Arlington Center out to Burlington, like the 350 bus does today. So the proposed network redesign version of Route 80 would also be a Route 350 replacement to Burlington Mall Road, 3rd Ave, and North Burlington, and would have both Green Line and Red Line connections at Medford Tufts and at Davis Station. Next we have route 83. On the left is our original proposal, which had been to extend the service to Kendall Square, which would have connected Rinjav, Inman Square, and the Port neighborhood to Kendall. But we heard from Cambridge staff and residents on the importance of the bus connection, specifically from Rinjav users, to the services and resources in Central Square, where the 83 terminates today. With other route improvements slated for Kendall Square, we felt that we could continue to route the 83 at Central without impacting the greater vision for improved connectivity to Kendall Square. So you can see on the right, we're preserving the 83 to Central Square in the new network. Next, we have route 87. We had formally proposed significant changes to Route 87, including tying together Broadway and Clarendon Hill with Harvard Street in Medford and Mystic Ave in Medford and Somerville. You can see the original proposal on the left, which is very different from today's 87 bus. One of the biggest concerns, and we heard many, many concerns from Somerville and Cambridge and Medford, was about the lack of direct service between Clarendon Hill, Davis, Union Square, Market Basket, Twin City Plaza, and Lechmere. And we heard a lot, lot, lot of comments on this. So in this proposal, we have restored the Route 87 as a direct route that travels from Arlington Center to Lechmere Station. And like in the proposal, the route would operate a consistent service pattern seven days a week, unlike today's route that only goes as far as Clarendon Hill on Sundays. So we would be having the 87 go to Arlington Center on Sundays, which is different from today's 87. This does mean that there would be a stretch of Harvard Street in Medford where we had proposed running new service and where we would not have service in the revised version of the network. Also, it means that Mystic Ave in Medford would be served via the Route 95, which I will talk about shortly. As part of the original 87 proposal, we had also had it be a combination with today's 67 bus to serve the Turkey Hill neighborhood in Arlington, as shown on the left. We received a significant amount of feedback from Turkey Hill that having a red line connection at Alewife specifically was important. We also heard from our operator in-reach efforts that the proposed route length from Turkey Hill to Sullivan was too long, especially since there are not good restroom facilities at the Turkey Hill end of the line, which is in a quiet residential neighborhood. This proposal spins off the 67 back onto a separate route, which would operate Turkey Hill to Alewife weekdays only, as shown on the right. There is a route change from today's 67 and that the bus would stay on Mass Ave from Arlington Center to Alewife Brook Parkway as a replacement for the 350 connections on this stretch into Alewife due to the 350 replacement with the 80 via Boston Ave that I spoke about earlier. This would omit Pleasant Street and Route 2, but those areas would still have other transit service under this proposal. Next, group 89. This is probably the other biggest issue that we had heard in Somerville and Medford. It was the lack of connection in our original map between Winter Hill, Ball Square, and Davis Square. On the left, you can see our original proposal, which included upgraded high frequency service on the T101 along Broadway at Goon Square, the new Green Line extension at Ball Square, and a high-frequency T96 service on College Ave, but there was not a direct connection between Winter Hill and Davis. In the new map on the right, you can see the proposed Route 89, which would operate consistently with a single service pattern between Davis and Sullivan, with a stop near the new Ball Square station on the Green Line extension that should be opening later this year. For Route 89 users, note that there would not be a mix of some Clarendon Hill trips and some Davis trips like there is today. For connections to Clarendon Hill, please use the 87 or the 90 and connect at Davis to this 89 service. Now, as a result of the 89 restoration, we have also put the T-101 back onto Main Street in Medford, like it does today, which serves a little farther north on the Medford side of Winter Hill, while the 89 will still serve Magoon Square on Broadway. So you can see on the map on the right, the 101, T-101 kind of takes this soft corner here on Main Street and omits Magoon Square, unlike the older version which had been squared off a little bit. I say squared off, that's not really a square. Next, Route 90 In response to concerns with reliability and route length, both from riders and also from our operator in-reach efforts, we've looked at shortening this route for better reliability. At the western end, this would not go to Arlington Center, but rather would terminate at Clarendon Hill. Broadway and Arlington would still be served by seven-day service on the Route 87 bus. On the eastern end, this would not go to Chelsea and Everett directly, but would terminate at Assembly Station. This is different from today's route in that we omit the Sullivan Station connections directly and instead provide an orange line connection on Revolution Drive at Assembly Station, much closer to the orange line than today's stop that's on Grand Union Boulevard. We also have a separate connection from Assembly to Chelsea and Everett as Route 113 that I'll get into shortly. Now also in response to concerns about the difficulty of connections between Route 90 and the Green Line, especially since this route is intended to be a Route 88 replacement, And especially since Gilman Station on the Green Line Extension right behind City Hall and the high school is surrounded with steep grades, there was also a small reroute onto Tufts Street and Washington Street to help facilitate better transfer opportunities at East Somerville Station on the Green Line Extension. This requires some street crossings, but we hope this can make a better transfer option available, especially in winter months when steep grades can be most challenging. And then there were also several comments, more than several, many, many comments received on the original proposal regarding the loss of service frequency along Highland Ave overall. We looked at some of our hours calculations and this criticism was absolutely fair and not our intention. So as a result, this service has been upgraded to every 20-minute service, mostly seven days per week, with some periods of every 30-minute service after 10 p.m. Lastly, I do want to highlight that this service is intended to be a combination of the route 88 and 90. So the service would become a more significant route than the 90 is today. It would still serve Clarendon Hill, as it had done in our original proposal. And it would still serve those important school related trips that students and caregivers from all over Somerville might be making to get from West Somerville and Davis and Spring Hill to the high school or to the East Somerville Community School or to the Capuano. Also, the simplified schedules that were published on the trip planner, do not include any of those special trips that may be needed that might operate today. For example, today there are some afternoon trips on Route 88 that start at the high school during Somerville High School on Highland Ave. during periods when large crowds of students might overwhelm the regular 88 service traveling through. So our expectation is that these trips could still operate, but that they would become 90 trips instead of 88 trips. And I had mentioned as part of the Route 90 shortening that we created the new Route 113. So it's been spun off into a separate route that would connect Assembly to Sullivan and over to Everett and Chelsea. This gets better connectivity between Chelsea, Everett, and Somerville, as had been suggested in our original proposal. And this has been extended to Bellingham Square in Chelsea, which was something we'd heard requested in our Chelsea focus groups, as the initial 90 proposal had only gone as far as Chelsea Station and the Market Basket. Next we have the routes 94 and 134. So 94 formerly had been proposed as shown on the left to serve Boston Ave, West Medford, Playstead Road, Winchester, Woburn, and Burlington. And in the new proposal, there is no route 94. So instead, we propose restoring the route 134 from North Woburn to Winchester, Medford and Wellington, along with some changes to the 80 and 354. Now there's a few reasons for this. One, there was a problem with the original route 94 and that the bus was not able to make one of the turns near West Medford station due to the railroad crossing and some of the intersection geometry. We also had a lot of interest in restoring the Route 354 express route in Burlington, Woburn, and Medford. But that led to some other network changes, including ultimately the elimination of Route 133 out to Anderson, Woburn as a resource offset. And I'll talk about that. I have another slide later. And then there's also the extension of Route 80 to Burlington that I spoke about on an earlier slide. So with all these changes, nearly all of the proposed 94 is covered by the new 80, 134, and 354. However, the one change that I do want to highlight is that Placestead Road, which is right about there in West Medford would not have direct service that had been served in our earlier version of the network. That stretch of Placedead Road is entirely within half a mile of other bus service on High Street or Winthrop Street or the commuter rail station also. Also, the proposed 134 would be a little different than today's 134 in that it's proposed to go down Locust Street in Medford, which is that little street right next to the Wegmans. And then it would also have a more consistent service pattern with more full trips and fewer of those short, weird trips that run on nights and weekends that only go to Medford Square. 95. Formerly, our proposal on the 95, shown on the left, would go to Wellington. The revised version on the right goes via Mystic Ave and serves part of Medford that are poised for substantial redevelopment, and is similar to what most 95 trips do today. This also fills in for the route 87 that I spoke about earlier, which has been restored to leech mirror and the revised map. So the 95 is filling that void on Mystic Ave that was left behind by shifting the 87 back to its current alignment. So compared to today's 95, there would be one consistent service pattern, in that the route would go from Arlington to Sullivan consistently, rather than the current service pattern where some trips start in Arlington and some trips start on Placetip Road. Also, the frequency of this route is slated to improve to every 20 minutes, mostly, seven days a week, with perhaps some 30-minute service after 10 p.m. This fills in a gap in between the three high frequency corridors that were newly proposed in Medford as part of the bus network redesign process. So that gives more prominence to this Route 95 in Medford. Also in Medford, we have some changes to the Route 99 and 108. Bus route 99 was proposed as shown on the left most map, and would serve Middlesex Ave and Medford and Wellington station. Now based on feedback we heard regarding loss of service to commercial street. think that's actually Malden near the super 88 and Medford Street near some medical facilities like the Cambridge Health Alliance and also other locations in Everett from current 97 riders. We've extended the 99 in the center map like a 97 through Everett to the Broadway and to the Gateway Center and on to Wellington. The Middlesex Ave portion of the route would still be served by the extended 108 as shown on the right which had formerly been proposed to terminate at Malden. So in this case what we ended up with is there's net one more route kind of between Malden Center and Wellington so that we could fill in some gaps that had been left in the initial version of the network, but there's no sections that we're discontinuing globally as part of this package of changes here. Bus route 100. This had been proposed to continue via the current terminus near Elm Street across to Governors Ave and then up Winthrop Street to Medford High School and out this way. We propose that the 100 should terminate as it does today near Elm Street because we've restored the 134 service on Winthrop Ave through Medford Square and over to Wellington. Though this does mean that there would be no service on Governor's Ave. When we did have bus service operating there, it was very, very low ridership. Only a couple more slides. We have some changes, bus routes 133 and 131. The 133 initial proposed route is on the left. In the new network, there is no route 133, but we've modified our proposed 131. provide much of the functionality. So the 133 initially had included new service to Anderson-Woburn commuter rail, and had been part of a package of changes to create local bus service instead of the express services in Burlington and Woburn, and new connections to Stona, Melrose, and the Orange Line. However, with the restoration of the 354 express route, one of the trade-offs was that we had to truncate some new service extensions. So you can see that we're no longer showing bus service to Anderson-Woburn. The North Woburn service will be part of the 134 route that I spoke about previously, and the local Woburn, Stoneham, and Melrose connection will be part of the route 131. Oh, thank goodness. I have a little more time. So as part of the route network changes, we also removed part of the proposed extension of Route 131 out to Saugus and Lynn, but most of this is picked up with the modified 429. That's primarily outside of our service area, so I won't go into too much detail there. So going back to the $350,000, we talked about this briefly when I mentioned the $80,000 earlier. One thing that the proposed $80,000 does differently than the initial proposed $350,000 on the left is that we would continue to serve Burlington Mall Road and 3rd Avenue directly, the original proposal had separated out the Burlington Mall Road portion of the route onto a separate 94 to make the 350 more direct and thus have shorter, more competitive travel times as part of the 354 express bus elimination. But with the preservation of 354 service that I'll talk about in a minute, the existing route structure was retained, although it's been shifted as an extension of the Route 80 instead of the 350 via AOA. So we would still go to Burlington, we would still go to Winchester and Woburn and Arlington, but it will be as the Route 80 to Davis and Bedford-Tufts Green Line extension instead of to Alewife on the Red Line. bus route 354. From the northern suburbs, this is probably the biggest change that we've made. We'd heard a lot of feedback that our initial proposal did not have any express service to Burlington, Woburn, or Medford. Instead, we had redrawn service in those neighborhoods to have seven day local service to feed into the red, orange, and or green lines. But one of the things we'd heard from Medford, Woburn, Burlington was that the travel times were not competitive and that there was a lot of interest in retaining the direct connection into downtown Boston. Because of the challenges of parking in the downtown, many folks conveyed that they have a car, but they're most likely to use transit for those downtown-oriented trips where parking is constrained. So in this revised proposal, the 354 would continue to do what it does today and would serve Burlington, Woburn, and Medford during rush hours on weekdays. In order to make that work with our resource changes, there were a number of other route changes that I mentioned already to keep us within our hours budget for this change in our vehicles and our operator camps. Then we have one more change, the bus route 54. There was a route change to this. It starts in Arlington Center and had originally been proposed to extend over to Riverside and Newton as a crosstown connection. We had a route change to use Pleasant Street in Belmont instead of Waverly Street due to some narrow roadway and concerns about the ability to accept bus traffic. There was also a frequency change to this route as an offset for some of the other service restorations that are part of the new package. So this would be about every 30 minutes during rush hours and about hourly for the rest of the day. And lastly, we truncated this route at Waltham Centre rather than Riverside, as had been suggested in the original proposal. And here's another map that shows the truncation. It was a big root, so you can see it originally went to Riverside and now is being proposed to go to Waltham Center instead. There were routes that did not change since the May proposal, the T1, T66, 68, 69, T71, T73. Those are all substantially the same routes as they are today. In the case of those T routes, Many of them are better frequency late at night because we've promoted, we've improved what it means to be a high frequency route. Today those key bus routes are generally every 20 minutes or better. And our expectation is still that they would be every 15 minutes or better. And we're still excited that we're promoting new routes like the T110. from Wellington and Medford over to Wonderland to be high frequency. We're excited that we're promoting the T70 from Waltham Centre through Watertown and Cambridge into Kendall as a new high frequency service. And those didn't change. So those are some of the things that we're still very excited about. In some cases, we also had a change that was just a frequency or a span adjustment, but not a route change. So the 78 has later evening service till 1 a.m., like it does today. It had been kind of in a bucket with other types of services that only had service till 10 p.m., but it was not our intention that that would be a service cut. So we've made it clear that we intend to keep that until 1 a.m., like it does today. So with that, That is all the changes that I wanted to make sure that I had a chance to explain to folks. So now we have a few minutes for questions and answers. So if you're interested, I recommend putting your questions into the chat. or comments into the chat because we're able to save those. I know we're short on time, so we might not have a chance to get to everyone. So I do encourage anyone who's able to put your questions and comments into the chat. And I do see that we have a few hands raised. So if I may, let's see.
[SPEAKER_04]: 何塞·德·马塔瓦拉，我让你闭嘴了。
[SPEAKER_15]: 是的，你好。 我的问题是关于从惠灵顿到波士顿市中心的 Wellington Express 巴士。 这是您应该乘坐的特快巴士之旅。 我在任何地方都没有看到这个列出。 我想检查一下为什么它停止了。
[Unidentified]: 这很有趣。 我不知道有没有从惠灵顿到波士顿市中心的特快巴士。
[SPEAKER_15]: 惠灵顿。
[Unidentified]: 啊，伯灵顿。 翻译们，我即将关闭休息室，所以如果你们能做好准备，人们将聚集在主房间。 好的，欢迎大家。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 我希望你们在小组中进行了精彩的讨论。 我想提醒您，您必须再次选择您的语言。 缩放控件上有一个按钮，上面写着“解释”。 选择您的语言，即使该语言是英语。 这将使您能够听到对翻译成英文的问题和答案的评论。 在此会议期间，选择英语、西班牙语或普通话。 使用缩放控件时，有一个翻译按钮，我会自己切换到英语频道，因此请使用该控件选择您的首选语言。
[Unidentified]: 嗯，谢谢大家。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 据我所知，一些分组讨论室有很多内容需要审查，可能没有足够的时间进行问答。 我们现在将在会议期间进行公开问答。 阿曼达，你可以重新开始录音了。
[Frances Mitchell]: 录音正在进行中。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 我将从那里重新开始。 欢迎来自分组讨论室的各位。 我知道一些分组讨论室有很多内容需要审查，可能没有太多时间进行问答。 现在让我们进行一个公开的问答环节。 我们希望听到大家的意见。 我们将从民选官员开始，但首先 抱歉，我想确认本次会议已达到我们 Zoom 帐户的容量，即一次会议可容纳 300 名参与者。 我们对这一疏忽深感遗憾。 我们知道有超过 300 人想参加这次会议，所以我们将再举行一次会议，并使用容量更大的 Zoom 许可证，以便每个愿意参加会议的人都可以参加。 所以内容和这次会议是一样的。 我们将尽快安排并 人们将能够参加这次会议。 因此，对于给人们带来的不便以及想要参加的人无法参加本次会议，我们深表歉意。 因此，这取决于我们，我们将通过召开另一次会议并确保我们的 Zoom 许可证不受相同容量限制来解决此问题。 我现在请 Regan Shakyo 发言，他将主持问题和回答。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，道格拉斯。 Terry，您可以转到下一张幻灯片吗？ 道格提到，我们将首先从民选官员那里得到一些问题和评论，然后我们将进入一般问答部分，所以我要请那些不是民选官员的人此时放下手，我会的。 稍后会有时间，同时我会打电话给你。我看到康诺利议员正在耐心等待，所以我现在就重新激活他。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_24]: 你能听到我吗？ 你好。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 他可以。 谢谢。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_24]: 极好的。 好的，谢谢您今晚的招待。 我是剑桥和萨默维尔州众议员迈克·康利。 而且，你知道，我想首先我必须从一开始就说，我想郑重声明，我实际上在这次会议上花了更多时间聆听无法出席会议的选民的意见。 向我发送电子邮件或推文，或者在某些情况下向我发送短信，询问发生了什么事。 因此，我能够真正专注于演示内容，然后就离开了剑桥萨默维尔的会议室，在那里没有时间回答任何问题。 就这样，休息室结束了，无数的人举手，没有人回答任何问题。 所以，你当然知道，话虽如此，我知道公交网络重新设计团队已经付出了很多努力，并且在第二次迭代中做了很多工作，回应了他们从萨默维尔和剑桥收到的成百上千条评论。 以及我七月份寄出的九页信。 但如果不先解决这些流程问题，就很难弄清楚底线。 你知道，我真的很欣赏你说你的首要任务是集中股权。 但我还要说，你知道，如果讨论的是从单座旅行转向双座旅行，并且巴士频率更高，以适应这种变化，我认为 MBTA 将证明这一承诺是可以兑现的。 正如我们在会议早些时候听到的那样，由于雇用运营商的短缺，以及我们在建造新的公交车停车场方面遇到的挑战， 你知道，我认为有很多部分需要发挥作用。 因此，我要问的一件事是，不要取消任何服务，至少在我们有机会看到一些事情之前，看看公平份额变化如何发挥作用，以及可能用于支持 MBTA 的数十亿美元额外收入的潜力，它是如何运作的，看看州长的新政府如何解决这些问题。 对于我所在的地区来说，另一件特别重要的事情不仅仅是对绿线延伸可能意味着什么做出假设，而是允许绿线延伸完全完成，以便其全面运行，并让我们有机会分析数据。 了解绿线延长线如何影响公交车乘客量，以确保我们不会乘坐从东剑桥或东萨默维尔出发的公交车路线。 嗯，首先不了解这一点。 这些是一些普遍关注的问题。 嗯，你知道，就一些具体说明而言，我今天听到剑桥学校委员会的一位成员对 68 路公交车等问题提出了具体的担忧。 你知道，我知道几年前我们在68路公共汽车年久失修的时候致力于保护它，我们希望看到68路公共汽车呃，得到维护。 高峰时段，不仅是白天的巴士，而且还会持续频繁地提供服务，直到晚上 8 点。 68 路公交车服务于剑桥市最贫穷和最多元化的社区之一。 这就是为什么我认为，从公平的角度来看，对 68 辆公交车的任何削减都会引发严重的危险信号。 78路公交车也是如此。 我已经听到剑桥官员的反馈，他们希望将这一时间延长到晚间高峰时段，即晚上 8 点。 在 CT2 巴士上，我知道大家对此有很好的意图。 据我了解，您现在将 CT2 公交车称为 85 路公交车。 但我在这里，我是国家代表，我非常关心这些事情。 这里有太多的东西，我很难跟踪它们。 这就是为什么我会再次鼓励你 不仅仅是安排另一次会议，而是考虑稍微推迟整个过程，以推迟任何联邦申请，并实际上给我们在萨默维尔和剑桥的我们需要的时间。 也许我们应该专门为萨默维尔市和剑桥市举行一次会议。 我注意到我们的会议室大约有 130 人。 从如此清晰聚集的三百人来看，这里有着巨大的兴趣。 我还可以继续说下去。我要暂时放弃这个词。 我想说的是，你知道 47 路公交车看起来像是我们社区的胜利。 83 路和 89 路公交车似乎是重大胜利，87 路公交车延长至凌晨 1 点也是如此。 这里有很多事情我很感激，但最重要的是我们需要另一次会议，我们可能需要多次会议，我们需要大量的时间进行沟通和参与，以确保我们把事情做好。 非常感谢。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，康诺利副警长。 我很欣赏你的评论。 我看到拉芙利参议员举起了手。 我会给你取消静音，参议员。
[SPEAKER_24]: 谢谢。 我转向我的车。 我的发言将很简短，我的代表卡恩斯也将参加。 所以我想把发言权交给你，但我只是要求 435 路公交车和丹弗斯，我是参议员约翰·拉弗利，代表丹弗斯·贝弗利·塞勒姆和皮博迪。 丹弗斯的 435 路公交车，通往丹弗斯广场的环路已被切断，我要求 T 恢复该环路，即我们拥有的一英里环路。 丹弗斯是一个 该社区为依赖这项服务的智障成年人提供集体之家。 这些集体住宅位于市中心。 我们倾听选民的意见。 谁依赖这种交通，但现在他们无法使用。 因此，我建议恢复 435 路前往丹佛广场的环路。 我请丹佛的好代表发言。 谢谢。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，参议员。 我没有看到卡恩斯议员举手。 卡恩斯议员，如果您想发表评论，请举手，我会认出您。
[Unidentified]: 好的。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 一切都好。 我看到其他人都举起了手，但我也知道是时候进行问答了，人们已经耐心地等待了一整晚。 哦，有人，是的。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 众议员莎莉·卡恩斯举起了手。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 她做到了。 对不起，副官。 让我为您取消静音，代表。
[SPEAKER_16]: 谢谢。 我的发言将非常简短。 我有四个朋友、选民，他们今晚抽出时间来表达自己的意见。 我要放弃了。 我只想重申，正如洛夫莱斯参议员所说，穿过丹弗斯广场的 435 号环路对我们丹弗斯来说非常重要。 我们是一个有需要的社区。 谢谢。 我还想回应以下人士分享的有关该流程的评论和担忧 迈克·康利，我在剑桥的同事。 有了这个，我就会付出我的时间。 谢谢。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢，非常感谢您的评论。 好吧，正如您在屏幕上看到的，我不会介绍提出问题或发表评论的所有不同方式。 如果您想举手或在“立即提问”部分发表评论，或者像阿曼达刚刚在聊天中发布的那样，还有一个评论表，您可以在其中发表评论。 嗯,现在我要请大家发表非常简短的评论,嗯,今晚不到2分钟。 我不想打扰别人，但我知道今晚有很多人等了一个小时。 我将从黛安·史密斯开始。
[SPEAKER_30]: 你好戴安娜。 你能听到我吗？
[SPEAKER_30]: 好吧，在我们的第三次工作会议期间，看起来波士顿交通部将代替 MBTA 来决定七号巴士路线的处理方式。 所以我建议有人 我将被要求参加下次访问，即他们与波士顿交通部举行的下一次会议，以便他们可以回答有关七号巴士发生情况的问题。 这就是我的建议。 我的问题是，有谁知道波士顿交通部是否接受关于七号巴士路线的评论？ 谢谢。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 谢谢黛安的提问。我想在这里澄清一点。 我们建议七号线从南波士顿到市中心，连接南站和北站，然后经过查尔斯敦到达沙利文广场。 我们已提议一条穿过市中心的路线，但波士顿市正在进行一项名为“北站至海港多式联运走廊”的规划工作。 该规划过程包括确定理想。 连接北站和南站的市中心公交车道的位置，我们正在与波士顿市就这项工作的进展进行协调。 在网络上的许多地方，议会通常拥有道路（在我们提供服务的情况下），在很多情况下，议会正在执行的规划流程将对未来的公交网络产生影响。
[SPEAKER_30]: 嗯，现在谁在说话？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 我是道格·约翰逊，我是波士顿的项目经理。
[SPEAKER_30]: 奥拉·道格。 贝姆，道格拉斯。 那么，既然您知道公交车去哪里，那么您知道通往波士顿市中心的哪条街道是最市中心的吗？你知道那条街的名字吗？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 所以现在我们展示的是七号沿夏季街到南站，然后使用国会街和邮局，对不起，珍珠街和国会街穿过邮局广场，然后国会街到北站，然后穿过北华盛顿街大桥到查尔斯敦。
[SPEAKER_30]: 好吧，确实没有，它不像以前那样能到达波士顿市中心，我认为这是一个问题，但没关系，非常感谢。
[Adam Hurtubise]: 感谢您的评论。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢。 我要去找罗宾·福雷斯特，几分钟前他举手给我发消息时遇到了困难。 罗宾，你能把声音打开吗？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_07]: 是的。 你能听到我吗？ 是的。 是的。 非常感谢。 我乘坐441路公交车。 这是我上下班、去医生办公室、在文顿广场购物的主要路线。 根据计划，您将完全消除 441。 所以这对我来说是一个很大的困难。 我不知道为什么 MBTA 正在考虑在 442 上增加更多公交车，并取消一条会让其他人望而却步的路线 这将是有益的，因为这对我来说并不是一个进步。 而我，就像我说的，这对我来说是一个很大的困难。 我不断发送评论和调查，试图让人们倾听我的声音。 我也不明白为什么人们，有些人从马布尔黑德出发，在天堂路和沼泽地下车，去搭乘沼泽地通勤列车。 这样一来，并不是每个人都需要乘坐火车才能到达波士顿。 但这样一来，每个人都必须从马布尔黑德 (Marblehead) 或沼泽门 (Swampsgate) 前往林恩 (Lynn) 才能搭乘火车前往波士顿。 所以，不，你知道，就像人们在重做这个计划之前不会问问题一样。 因为就像我说的，这对我来说是一场巨大的斗争。 我今年 50 岁了。 我使用公共交通工具。 我没有车。 我不开车。 你正在接管天堂路上的每一家医生办公室。 我的意思是，下面不会发生任何事情。 我到处都得乘电梯或者出租车。 这是非常昂贵的。 我只是想让你重新考虑一下。 我的意思是，如果您要从另一条路线上取下更多巴士，为什么要在 442 上放置更多巴士呢？ 我不明白。 你只是，你知道，从彼得那里拿钱来支付保罗，但你知道，你正在让一些人，你知道，赢得彩票，而其他人，你知道，让你得到轴。 所以我只是想让你重新考虑一下。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢。 非常感谢您的评论。 道格，我不知道我们是否愿意。
[Adam Hurtubise]: 梅丽莎，你能和 442 和 455 多谈谈吗？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_07]: 谈论您想要取消的 441。 这就是我所感激的。
[Unidentified]: 与 441 交谈。 建议我们合并 441 和 442 的资源，现在我们有两个不同的分支机构。 有时他走内陆路线，有时则走沿海路线。 并拥有这个 分支结构增加了很多复杂性。 我们认识到有些人正在使用这些不同的路线。 但我们试图做的是提供更频繁的服务、更易读的服务，因为有时，尤其是在中午，您最终会遇到每 90 分钟一班的巴士。 我们想说，好吧，这需要什么？ 我们需要什么才能建立 Marblehead 服务，以便它们每小时到达，或者更确切地说，持续到达？ 这就是目的。 我知道有很多人。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 是的。 谢谢你，梅丽莎。 是的，我想我们将继续与安布尔·麦克马洪合作。 我会给你取消静音。 你好，一切都好吗？ 你好。 感谢您的等待。
[SPEAKER_19]: 只是一个简短的评论和问题。 首先，我被告知有人会联系我，询问我之前会议的信件和评论以及已发送和尚未发送的认证信函。 我想知道是否有人愿意这样做。 另外，54 Pleasant Street 的营业时间和班次是多少？
[Adam Hurtubise]: 梅丽莎，我要把你交给你了。
[Unidentified]: 我正在复习 1954 年的笔记。因此，随着频率的变化，正如我在工作组中也提到的那样，我们最初建议其频率为中频，但根据新的时间表，它计划主要是每小时一次，每周 7 天，从早上 6 点到晚上 7 点。 直到晚上7点。上午 10 点之前，频率会稍低一些。米。
[SPEAKER_19]: 好的，那么这是每小时一次吗？ 什么？
[Unidentified]: 一天中的大部分时间大约每小时一次。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢梅丽莎和安巴尔。 我会把它交给汉娜贝尔彻。
[Unidentified]: 安娜. 您应该能够将其静音。
[SPEAKER_13]: 嗨，我叫艾琳，我刚刚取消静音。 因此，如果有机会发言，我愿意发言。 我知道你问的是汉娜，但我想我抽到了。 所以我想发表几点评论。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 当然，我不确定汉娜发生了什么事，但我们会找到她。 但谢谢你，艾琳。 阿德兰特。
[SPEAKER_13]: 谢谢。 首先，我谨向副部长表示祝贺。 迈克·康利. 我的感觉和他一样。 我认为您需要考虑很多事情才能获得特定位置的答案，如果人们能够花一些时间在我们的社区中并提供一对一的意见，那将非常有帮助。 分析我们的社区中与我们的服务相关的实际情况。 我还想提一下更多的公交车，但我们正在削减服务，这是不公平的。 我也有同样的感觉，就像其他人谈论南波士顿的第七个服务一样，我们有一个非常大的群体。 我也举手了，我也在聊天中提出了问题，但我没有机会回答。 所以像今晚其他许多人一样，我猜你正在努力适应 我们中的许多人都表达了我们的担忧和回应。 我真的认为您可以考虑来到我们的社区，让我们有机会充分了解您的计划。 非常令人担忧的是，对于波士顿来说，它告诉我们必须确定的是 BTD。 这就是我们真正需要您和 BTD 参与的原因。 那会有帮助的。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢您的评论。 我正要这么做，我看到汉娜又举起了手。 我再试一次。 我对技术上发生的事情表示歉意，汉娜。
[SPEAKER_01]: 你好。 你好。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 是的，我对此感到抱歉。
[SPEAKER_01]: 一切都好。 我是汉娜·贝尔彻（Hannah Belcher），我是温思罗普小姐议员，我在我们的具体部分发表了评论，所以我要保存它们，但我同意代表目前提到的等待这一进展，直到新政府就位，我们看到资金或优先事项将如何变化。 我还想对数据分析的方式发表评论，手机大数据。 我知道，在城市中，这非常有帮助，因为当您到达温思罗普等地区和城外的一些较小社区时，您拥有非常大的样本量。 我认为 MBTA 有必要从不同的角度审视这些社区，以确保我们不处于弱势地区。 就像温斯洛普的雪莉角社区一样，我确信还有其他邻近的城镇，距离波士顿稍远一些，也经历着同样的事情。 所以我只是想澄清这一点。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，我很感谢你今晚的评论。 我将举起双手继续。 我会让你们知道，对于那些在聊天中发表评论的人，我们正在记录所有评论，即使今晚没有大声朗读，它们也将成为记录的一部分。 接下来我要谈谈丹尼尔·兰德斯。
[SPEAKER_36]: 好吧，谢谢。 我叫丹尼尔·兰德斯。 我是丹弗斯的公民和居民。 我只想说，作为一名患有癫痫症和自闭症的人，我非常依赖 465 Danvers Square 巴士路线，因为它经常在我需要时带我去塞勒姆，或者在我需要时带我去皮博迪，或者只是整个城市。 它还会带我去火车站，因为我最近从麻省大学毕业并且想再次访问我的学校，所以我真的很想使用火车站。 我只是想说，很多像我一样由于残疾或任何其他疾病或痛苦而无法开车的人， 他们严重依赖公共交通以及公交车，特别是公交车路线。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢您的评论。 嗯，我会，我也知道人们有一些问题，嗯，道格，我只是想确保我在这里说出了所有内容，并将与今晚会议的录音一起发布。 嗯，如果录音效果好的话，所有工作会议的录音。 我们还打算发布会议的平台和摘要。 适合会议平台。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 就是这样。 我们将发布会议录音。 嗯，我们。 希望我们已经录制了所有工作室并将发布这些录音。 所有这些都将在项目网站上提供。
[Adam Hurtubise]: 该活动有一个活动页面。 我们都会在那里发帖。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 贝姆奥布里加多。 而且我也知道有些人说看不到聊天中的所有评论。 Isso é verdade。 但最终，我们将在最终报告中将它们全部包含在内。 Então não se preocupe。 我还知道有些人给我发消息是因为他们在使用举手功能时遇到困难。 阿尔贡斯。
[Unidentified]: 里根，你可能已经取消静音了。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢。 我要向朱迪思·雅各布斯求助，因为我知道她不久前给我发短信表示遇到困难。 我要取消朱迪思的静音。
[Unidentified]: 朱迪思，你能听到我说话吗？ 是的。
[MCM00000945_SPEAKER_27]: 你好。 你好里根。 非常感谢您认可我。 我知道这可能是一段艰难的时期。 今晚的挑战，很多人试图继续前进。 所以我的问题是：有一位居民联系过我，也联系不上我。 她担心路线，80 和 90 路公交车线路，我认为是克拉伦登山的人，实际上在萨默维尔，所以我来自萨默维尔，我是萨默维尔的居民，以及她的具体问题 这是为了查明之前的站点是否会恢复。 所以我认为她只需要对此进行澄清，因为她正在社区中领导这项工作，试图帮助居民了解这些变化。 所以如果你能谈谈这一点的话。
[Unidentified]: 你好，道格。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 抱歉，道格，我会来找你的。
[Unidentified]: 我想知道您能否澄清哪些站点正在恢复。 抱歉，我只是不关注你。
[MCM00000945_SPEAKER_27]: 好吧，我也不使用公交线路，但我是一个在城里参加过很多会议的人。 我在这方面一直非常积极。 我还要赞扬我们的代表康利指出了一些确实需要说的事情。 我很高兴你解决了这个问题。 所以问题是关于80路和90路公交车。 显然，对于这些路线是否会发生变化或是否已明显进行修改，存在一些讨论或困惑。 我想知道他们是否会采取以前的路径 做。 这就是我所拥有的一切。 抱歉，我不知道任何具体信息。 她给我发了一条消息，想让我把这个问题转告给大家。 嗯，谢谢你的澄清。
[Unidentified]: 我们在第二工作组中讨论了这一点，我们的网站 mbta.com 上还提供了地图和其他信息，但 BRND 除外，供那些无法参加本次会议的人使用。 以 80 年代为例，我们有 提出了新版本的 80 年代，因此它将与现有的 80 年代有所不同。 萨默维尔的部分路线主要从 Ball Square 出发并前往 Lechmere，我们不建议在未来绿线开通后继续使用 80 号公路，但我们确实建议从阿灵顿中心 (Arlington Center)和Boston Ave 出发的 80 号公路外部部分 College Ave 至 Davis Square 将成为新地图上 80 号公路的一部分。 事实上，我们打算将其扩展到伯灵顿，以替代 350。因此，请务必查看我们针对 80 号公路的新提案。 并且提出90比现在的90有更好的频率。还建议将其延伸到今天结束的戴维斯广场之外， Clarendon Hill，那么它就变成了 88 个酒吧和 90 个酒吧的组合，一天中的大部分时间每 20 分钟一班，也许在深夜每 30 分钟一班，这将是每周 7 天的服务，我们在沙利文和装配区的交通方面还有一些其他变化，所以一定要看看那里的地图。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，梅丽莎。 我谢谢。 特里，你介意转到下一个屏幕吗？ 以便人们拥有它。 我还想确认一下，我知道这次会议应该提前结束，但是道格，让我们继续前进，好吗？ 并再回答几个问题。 是的，我们是。 谢谢。 好吧，现在我要谈谈朱莉·凯利。 朱莉，你能取消静音吗？ 你好，你能听到我说话吗？
[Unidentified]: 是的。
[SPEAKER_18]: 我认为公共汽车已经到达工作地点，而且我听说他们正在更改时间表，稍后出发。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 早上，朱莉，如果我可以，如果我可以打断你的话，你一说完就消失了，你介意重复几号？ 你能听到我吗？ 你将再次完成。 你现在能听到我说话吗？ 是的。 还有我们。 PB，露皮塔·D·蒙托亚。
[SPEAKER_18]: PB，露皮塔·D·蒙托亚。 PB，露皮塔·D·蒙托亚。 PB，露皮塔·D·蒙托亚。 PB，露皮塔·D·蒙托亚。 是的，非常适合这一天，公交车时刻表将会改变，而且没有多大好处，因为它运行得更晚，我的意思是四班车而不是 330，在回家的路上只有 330 的站位，公交车工作人员已经在回家的路上停下来，公交车已经撞毁了。 我以前下午2点45分出发。 现在4点开始出发。 早上，人们从早上 6:30 出发，并于早上 6 点开始上路。 人们上班会迟到。 我们有些人在公交车上，早上公交车上有20到30人，早上我们6:30去上班。 当我们下车时，我们等了半个小时的公共汽车，这没有问题。 我们不介意等待。 但到了四点钟就会很拥挤。 已经起来了。 我们发现有 10 到 15 个人站在周围，通常是在回家的路上。 已经。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 一切都好。 非常感谢。 谢谢。 我很欣赏这些评论。
[Unidentified]: 感谢您指出这一点。 如果存在改道和拥挤问题，我们可以在服务规划团队中采取这种措施，而无需重新设计公交网络。 这是我们在正在进行的季度服务变更中所做的更改类型。 然后我可以向团队报告并请他们查看。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，梅丽莎。 接下来我要谈谈雷米·帕克。
[SPEAKER_03]: 你好，谢谢。 我只是有一个简短的评论和一个简短的问题。 我在董事会得到了一些答案，但在斯托纳姆这里，对于拟议的路线，他们展示了资本和一切，从 2023 年到 27 年的计划。 我只是想知道你是否愿意 为此建立了多条公交线路。 那么谁是23岁，谁是27岁？ 这是第一个问题。 康利代表关于需要更多时间的评论。 我必须说，自 2018 年以来，我一直参与这个重新设计更好的公交网络的计划。 所以，四年后，我们仍然没有 我们的脚还没有落地。 所以，我只想评论一下这个团队在未来做了很多外展和支持。 话虽如此，个人会员是否可以单独联系这些城市进行交谈？ There is a lot of stress and anxiety at this meeting and I feel bad for everyone, but 我真的只是想尝试前进，我不想再停滞不前了。 所以谢谢你。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 感谢您的评论。 我们现在正在制定实施计划并确定哪些路线 早年实施的内容以及以后可能实施的内容。 这将取决于我们的巴士运营商团队，这是我们现在正在努力的事情。 事实上，MBTA 刚刚改变了公交运营商的招聘做法。 我们过去要求人们在成为公交车司机之前必须拥有 CDL。 现在我们是 帮助那些想成为公交车运营商的人获得商业驾驶执照。 因此，我们正在努力解决运营商短缺问题，这将是实施这些服务变革的关键领域。 但我们现在正在制定实施计划，这将决定什么 我们每年都会这样做。 显然，我们会在发生任何更改之前提前通知您，但我们肯定会收到您的来信，告知更改的时间以及这些规划过程有时可能需要多长时间。 因此，我们现在正在制定实施计划，并将在未来几个月内获得有关第一阶段实施情况的更多信息。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 我知道有些人对在哪里可以获取有关该项目的先前会议的信息有疑问。 如果您访问当前屏幕上的项目网站，我确信阿曼达也会将其发布在聊天中，然后您向下滚动到过去的活动并单击各个会议，那么网站上也会链接到所有过去的会议和会议材料的会议记录。 也就是说，我要去杰克的蜡烛那里。
[Unidentified]: 杰克也没有。 你好。 是的。
[SPEAKER_04]: 出色的。 我在一个名为马萨诸塞州高级行动委员会的组织中。我是一名社区组织者。 我不是退伍军人，但我知道今晚的电话会议上有我们组织的三名成员，他们可以发言。 这将是令人惊奇的。 我知道他们中的一些人遇到了技术问题。 他们可能无法举手。 所以我会把我的时间奉献给玛丽·纳波利塔诺、路易丝·巴克斯特和玛莎·伦敦。 他们仍在通话中。 当然，剩下的时间都是我的。 四个要点，之后我的三个主要问题 在我们作为一个组织对此进行审查之后。 显然有一些好的改变，但我想更多地了解实际过程是什么，以确保在新修订的计划中解决老年人的关键问题。 我想知道各个县的流程是怎样的，以查看需要为老年人提供上锁服务的不同地点，并确保其得到维护。 我还想知道确保所有这些新的转移都是负担得起的过程是怎样的。 有没有一点一点的？ 您知道吗，您是否检查过每次新的转会以确保地理位置具有挑战性？ 我们可以向老年人开放吗？ 我的最后一个问题是：修订后的计划是否扭转了一些停靠站数量的减少？ 或者他们是否仍在减少停靠点以增加其中一些路线的班次？ 因为我知道在某些情况下这对老年人来说是一个问题。 谢谢你，我鼓励你看看是否可以让玛丽和其他人问一些问题。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 事实上，你能和我分享一下这些名字吗？ 我听到了路易丝的名字，却错过了其他名字。
[Unidentified]: 哦。 杰克，让我取消你的静音。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 杰克，其他名字是什么？
[SPEAKER_04]: 是的，抱歉，我本来想说玛丽亚·纳波利塔诺。
[SPEAKER_04]: 路易莎·巴克斯特。 还有玛塔·伦敦。 太好了，谢谢。 通话中可能还有其他人，但这些是我看到的。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 我们一定会今晚联系到他们。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 是的，我可以回答你的一些问题。杰克，感谢您出席会议并参与整个过程。 对于公交车站，我们正在积极努力确定系统中有多少个车站需要改进，以及我们需要在哪里为我们提议的服务找到新的车站。 因此，网络上的某些道路目前没有公交车服务。 这就是为什么我们需要确定无障碍站点的位置。 然后到那个站 现在就有了，就会有服务。 我们正在与全系统无障碍办公室合作开展 PADI 计划，以找出如何让站点变得无障碍。 在某些情况下，会在您当前的位置停留。 可以变得可访问。 有时条件不允许，如您所知，必须将停靠点移至可通达的位置。 因此，现在我们正在经历确定新网络以及传输站点的所有资本需求的过程。 因此，关于您关于转账地点的问题，并非所有 此时系统中的站已完全可访问。 如果我们预计某些地点无法完全无障碍，我们将研究如何使其无障碍。 因此，我们不一定认为现有的道路状况是理所当然的。 我们想要 对整个网络进行重大改进，以提高可达性，并且，您知道，使站点变得无障碍，使换乘地点可以到达任何我们想要的地方。 所以这是一个现在正在进行的过程。 我们也很高兴继续与大众互动委员会的人员会面，讨论所有这些变化和流程。 我认为 内容可能比您想要涵盖的内容更多，我们很乐意与您讨论我们在本次会议中可以涵盖的内容。 因此，我们很高兴在稍后的会议上与大家见面。 但我认为我们可以继续打电话给你提到的那些人，如果他们还在这里的话，里根。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 好吧，我会打电话给路易丝·巴克斯特。
[Unidentified]: 我会给你取消静音，路易丝。 是的，我，问题已经有了。 但是，你知道，就像案例 12 一样，我只是想确保它是为波士顿医疗公司完成的，但我想我很高兴你为老年人和所有事情做了很多考虑。 但我已经谈过T12了。 我不确定 BMC 最终会走向何方。 我感谢您向前辈提供的所有信息。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢您的评论。 玛丽，我看看玛丽·纳波利塔诺，我看看你是否愿意取消静音并分享任何评论。
[Unidentified]: 玛丽亚？
[SPEAKER_00]: 是的，我刚刚收到一些评论类型的问题。 我知道计划是不在沙利文站设置 90 路公交车食品站。 我很担心，因为我与该地区的工人进行了交谈，他们依靠这 90 个人前往卡利并返回家园。 他们早上到达那里，下午在儿童城、抗压中心工作，只有在这个一般区域，他们才担心如何回家。 这是一个问题。 关于 90 还有一件事，如果你停在集合站， 步行即可到达该地区那个购物中心的 Trader Joe's。 我发现从90路到90路公交车站都很难，更不用说步行额外的距离了。 那么你就排除了真正想要使用该区域的人。 我去Trader Joe's，我不吃麸质。 有些事情我刚刚到达那里， 这让我很担心。 而且在 88 号公路上，我也有担忧，不是为我自己，因为我不进城或该地区的很多不同地方，但我们有 60 多岁、70 多岁和 80 多岁的工人仍在路上，以拥有一个需要前往莱赫米尔的区域。 因此，您可以将一两个座位的座位变成三或四个座位。 这让我很担心，因为 90 路公交车从不早上发车。 总是在 6:30、7:00 左右，人们在 7:00、7:30 工作，如果你做了很多改变，你就会上班迟到。 所以这是另一个问题，他们回家后也会遇到同样的问题。 这是我关心的问题，不是为了我自己，而是为了我在这条道路上认识的其他人。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢您的提问和评论。
[Unidentified]: 如果我能参加其中的一些就好了。 该提议是让 90 路公交车更靠近集合站，但 Grand Union Boulevard 上仍然有一个上车点，就在 Trader Joe's 前面。 所以也许你也可以。 从 Assembly Station 朝一个方向步行到 Trader Joe's 有点像，但是当您买好杂货并准备返回萨默维尔或 Highland Ave 或其他任何地方时，只需步行到 Grand Union Boulevard，即今天的巴士站即可。 90 的提案应该是，我将其称为 88 和 90 的组合，所以它会更早开始， 尤其是周日，和周日一样，今天的90只能是早上十点开始，下午六点结束什么的。 建议提供全程服务，每周 7 天，一天大部分时间大约每 20 分钟一班，或者更接近每 30 分钟一班，例如晚上 10 点之后。 因此，它的频率比现在的 90 好得多，因为它正在获得新的功能。 88 之前所做的部分工作。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢梅丽莎。 我想。 提醒大家，如果您尝试在聊天中发表评论，请勿直接向个别项目团队成员发送消息，而是将您的评论直接发送给提出问题的人。 这样，我们一定会收到您的所有评论和问题。 接下来我将与科琳·墨菲交谈。 科琳，你应该取消静音。
[SPEAKER_17]: 你好，你能听到我说话吗？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 你好，是的。
[SPEAKER_17]: 你好，我是温思罗普居民。 我有一个问题。 据我了解，您的建议是巴士在温思罗普游艇俱乐部码头停靠？
[Unidentified]: 我们建议停靠点不是在游艇俱乐部，而是在所谓的渡轮码头，在船只停车场。 公众。
[SPEAKER_17]: 是的，我不仅希望他们记住，在冬天，该地区的每个人都可以使用这个停车位，因为冬天有暴风雨时没有路边停车位。 夏季，这里是全天供船只进出的广泛码头。 而且因为人太多，每人都打包。 我只是，为什么公共汽车不能，它可能会回来。 和。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 所以我很抱歉，科琳。
[SPEAKER_17]: 是因为这个吗？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 你已经完成了，科琳。 对不起。
[SPEAKER_17]: 我只是想让你记住这是一种习惯。 你现在能听到我说话吗？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 你能听到我吗？ 是的。
[SPEAKER_17]: 是的。 你听到我说的关于着陆的事了吗？ 这是公共着陆。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 好的，太好了。 我们得到了那部分。
[SPEAKER_17]: 它是一个广泛使用的公共登陆码头。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 你能听到我吗？ 梅丽莎，我不知道你听说过多少。 他为我进进出出。
[Unidentified]: 因此，我们不建议占用整个停车场。 我们只是希望能够到达这个地段，作为获得额外连接的一种方式，比如温思罗普渡轮。 事实上，这是我们从温思罗普交通咨询委员会正式会面时听到的要求。 我不知道他们是否还见面。 这可能可以追溯到几年前，还有其他一些人，但有兴趣在那个停车场获得服务。 我们的某些服务的终点站不是温思罗普海滩，而是或多或少位于再往北一点的游艇俱乐部区域。 我们看到的服务中断的一件事是，我对雪莉角地区的服务中断感到有些沮丧，但今天的服务中断之一是 他有时会去雪莉角，这可能是工作日高峰时段三分之一的行程。 有时，您有多种选择，有时是前往雪莉角的长途巴士和长途路线，有时是服务温思罗普半岛主要部分的较短路线。 这会造成拥挤和时间表的不规律，因此当长巴士经过车站时，它可能就在一辆较短巴士的后面并有它们。 当我们在温思罗普约 96% 的乘客不在游艇俱乐部之外，而是在温思罗普人口较多的地区时，向雪莉角提供服务可能会造成不规则和聚集的服务间隙，是否会有公共汽车，你知道， 相隔两分钟，下一班将在 35 分钟后。 当长短途路线有变化时，我们会遇到这些奇怪的时间表不规则现象。 因此，我们正在努力做的事情之一就是引入更多的一致性和规律性，以便 96% 的温思罗普乘客获得更清晰的服务、更好的班次和均匀的行程。 这就是该提案背后的理由。 谢谢你，梅丽莎。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 好的，现在我要和克拉克·弗雷泽谈谈。 克拉克，你应该能够自己取消静音。
[SPEAKER_08]: 是的，谢谢。 我会尽量简短。 我想说一些关于公交车站的事情。 就像昨天一样，我在 220 号公路韦茅斯的河道广场 (Riverway Plaza)，那里没有公交车站标志。 我早些时候从一个公共汽车站出发，也没有标志。 我找不到它。 我认为 我希望所有公交车站都有没有标记的人行横道。 这一直是欣厄姆的一个问题。 我只想谈谈一般的日程安排。 我希望他们能去，当我说定期间隔时，我的意思是真正定期的间隔，比如半小时，而不是35分钟，不是28分钟，不是17分钟，因为这就是公共汽车适合的时间。 下午220真的要早半个小时吗？ 如果是这样，您将如何处理每 13 分钟就有进展的红线？ 如何建立可预测的联系？ 我的意思是，我对 MBTA 最大的抱怨是从 A 点到 B 点需要多长时间，因为我必须在中间等待不可预测的时间，这意味着我必须给自己额外的半小时或一个小时。 到达某个地方，因为我不知道连接需要多长时间。 所以我的问题是：你打算怎么做？ 可以时间转移吗？ 可以多点时间吗？ 你有更好的时间吗？ 您知道如何通过计算机以电子方式发送它，知道吗？ 那么你要做什么？ 因为我在使命宣言中没有看到这一点。 我在那里没有看到任何有关连接的信息。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢您的评论。 嗯，梅丽莎，我知道除了重新设计公交网络以使其变得更好之外，还有很多举措正在发生。 呃，公共汽车上的运营。 嗯，但我不知道我们是否想讨论这个问题还是继续讨论下一个问题。
[Unidentified]: 如果我能花大约 15 秒的话。 我知道排队的人很多，所以我不想浪费太多时间。 但我们正在努力做的事情之一就是创造更多的高频服务，让转账体验更好。 通常，当红线上每 13 分钟发生一次事件时，这些转移的成本可能会较低。 这就是我们正在努力做的事情：更好地利用这些高频服务。 这就是简短的答案。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢。 我去找约翰·施特劳斯。 约翰，你应该取消静音。
[SPEAKER_02]: 谢谢你，雷加纳。 我是来自伯灵顿的 John Strauss，非常有趣的是，伯灵顿交通委员会也在开会，所以我同时召开了两次关于公交车运行的交通会议，每个人都对新的 80 路公交车路线感到非常兴奋，因为我们担心伯灵顿 Chestnut Street 和 Middlesex Turnpike 地区之间的往返行程。 但我想问几个问题。 这只是人们关心的问题 当乘坐 80 号公路旅行时，对于想要进城的人来说，经过沃本 (Woburn)，然后前往萨默维尔 (Somerville)，然后从那里乘坐红线，这将是一段很长的路。 我的另一个问题也是关于将 Alewife 的生物技术区连接到伯灵顿，因为我们在伯灵顿建立了三个新项目，其中一个在贝德福德，但它是通过 351 连接的。 现在，随着 350 的丢失，这种直接连接也被切断了。 因此，我们想让那些好奇的人知道是否会有任何相关内容，因为我们希望取消 SOV 旅行。 这就是这一切背后的基本动机。 我想提到的最后一件事是贝德福德医院的退伍军人服务。 再说一遍，只有 62 人去那里，从周边社区去那里并不是一个好方法。 去退伍军人医院。 如果你想留出时间而不是做得太好，你可以考虑它们。 但这些都是在讨论集团变更时出现的担忧。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 梅丽莎点点头，我猜想，我知道我们正在记下所有这些笔记，所以我想我们会带着这些担忧一起去。 真的吗，梅丽莎？ 很好，很棒。 我要去梅丽莎·诺维茨。 梅丽莎，你应该能说话。
[SPEAKER_14]: 你好，晚上好，谢谢。 我感谢上述评论以及迄今为止与流程相关的努力，但我很好奇是否有可能重新参加一些社区会议，特别是 T96 巴士，因为 5 月和 10 月的计划截然不同。 我知道今晚的电话会议上至少有五份关于修改路线的指示信，涉及高频服务的交通安全和排放。 我很好奇您是否可以评论一下针对某些受影响的路线重新召开社区会议的可能性。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 是的，我可以回答。 谢谢你的提问。 我们对 T 96 所做的改变是为了回应我们从温思罗普街和乔治街的人们那里收到的许多评论。 我们在五月份提出的建议。 对于那些街道上的许多乘客来说，这需要很短的距离，因为地形的原因，显然，正如你所知，这是梅德福山坡，因为一些街道的陡峭，人们很难像我们在五月份提议的那样获得这项服务。 因此我们听取了人们的反馈并相应地修改了路线。 所以我们把它放在大街上然后去 温特罗普。 在到达学院大道之前，它继续为温思罗普和乔治提供服务。 因此，这是根据我们收到的大量反馈而做出的改变，我们相信它响应了该地区公交车乘客的数量。
[Adam Hurtubise]: 我不知道你是否想对此添加任何内容。
[Unidentified]: 我把这个问题当作一个过程问题，道格。 我可以肯定地确认，我们已经收到了来自 Medford Hillside 社区的成百上千条评论。 这就是梅德福市长的信向我们指出的事情之一。 所以这对我们来说确实是一个优先事项。 但我不知道你是否想解决那里的流程问题，道格。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 是的，我们确实与萨诺维尔市和梅德福市以及梅德福规划部门就其中许多变化进行了会议。 因此，在推进这些路线的实施过程中，我们将继续与各市政府会面。 这可能还包括与社区组织和邻里协会举行会议，讨论这些变化。 但是 当然，专门针对这条路线。 我们认为我们对路线所做的改变确实回应了我们从那里收到的反馈，但我们当然很高兴继续与人们见面并讨论这些改变。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，道格拉斯。 我要请马特·盖顿来谈谈。 马特，你应该能够取消静音。
[SPEAKER_23]: 是的，我有关于阿灵顿 67 号公路的问题。 我很高兴你恢复了它，但我想知道是否有可能将后面的部分恢复成一条漂亮的街道，这样它就可以在出口处沿着一条漂亮的街道延伸。
[Unidentified]: 是的，感谢您指出这一点。 很抱歉我没有机会在我们的工作组中回答您的问题。 我们有很多内容要传达。 绕道至马萨诸塞大道和 67 号的原因是为了完成 Mass Ave 和 Alewife 之间的连接，该连接因其他一些网络变化而丢失。 所以这就是 这就是该提案的原因。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢，梅丽莎，我想记下来。 我知道我们在 8 点说过我们要继续走下去，我想，道格，我们要继续走下去。 我们将继续尽可能多地回答问题，直到口译员需要我们为止。 今晚停下来。
[Unidentified]: 是的。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 一切都好。 所以，嗯。 我的名字是里基·托马斯。 如果我读错了你的名字，我很抱歉。
[Unidentified]: 我让你沉默了，你想。那是一个非常好的发音。
[SPEAKER_20]: 是不是很糟糕？ 哦，谢谢。 我的名字是里基·托马斯。 我今年 14 岁。 我现在有点感冒，抱歉，如果我的声音听起来很有趣。 但我只想感谢你们所有人所做的这项工作。 但我有一些评论，首先是我很高兴 T-47 的频率很高，尽管联合广场附近萨默维尔的航站楼对我来说似乎有点奇怪，我认为将其扩展到 96 乘坐 96 路公交车前往沙利文站将会非常方便，特别是因为目前 91 路公交车从市中心开往沙利文站，而且这种直达交通很有帮助。 我的一种看法是，我不明白74为什么回来。 我感觉自己住在西剑桥。 在我看来，西剑桥的人们往往话很多。 声音最大的人似乎是充分利用这种情况的人。 我认为更好地利用这些资源是增加 78 的服务。 也许那辆备用巴士可以出发。 如果有额外的服务，你可以去另一个更需要的地方，但我认为不是74，而是在以后的时间里增加78的频率，这是特别必要的，可以服务更多的人，会有很大的帮助。 其他一些事情。 我注意到有些路线是从上午 9 点到下午 5 点。米。下午 4 点，我真的不明白，这也不能真正起到作用 旅客的路线将从上午 9 点开始。 下午 4 点 并且仅在一周内。 这对我来说似乎很奇怪。 我看到的两辆是439和451，它们是这些社区的唯一公共交通。 439 路是唯一服务 Nahant 的巴士。 我建议他们周末也工作，但仅限上午 9 点。 下午 4 点 我真的认为这对这些路线不利。 嘿，76。 嗯，我想你真的可以使用周末服务。 嗯，周末服务可能会返回 6276，但这是前往汉斯科姆空军基地的唯一中转。 我真的认为事情应该如此。 包容性。 恩里克，非常感谢你。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 是的。 非常感谢。 我们将接受这些意见。 我还鼓励您和每个人，如果您有较长的评论，请将它们留在评论表中，因为我们当然希望今晚听到所有深思熟虑的评论。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 我还要补充一点，恩里克，我们中的一些人观看了您关于起草的整个 YouTube 视频。 您在夏天创建的网络。 太棒了。 我非常感谢您的所有评论。
[Adam Hurtubise]: 我感谢您参与这一过程。 所以谢谢你。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 所以我要去寻找汤姆·拉马尔。 汤姆，你不应该再被沉默了。
[MCM00001546_SPEAKER_01]: 你好晚安。 感谢您在此项目上所做的工作。 我认为这里有很多非常好的东西。 我希望他们能够在强有力的公共程序中迅速落实这里的许多建议，以找出一些细节。 但我希望它能够兼容并快速发展，因为这里有很多非常好的东西。 我想讲的具体一点，恩里克实际上可能比我说得更好， 但我还想提一下，联合广场以东的 T96 和 T47 路线对我来说有点混乱。 我很好奇它是否打算部分连接东萨默维尔车站，但我想指出的是，巴士站位于东萨默维尔车站麦格拉斯高速公路的另一侧。 因此，尽管它们距离东萨默维尔车站比较近，几乎要换乘，但步行却是极其不愉快的。 因此，我建议您考虑将 T96 和 T47 中的一处或全部沿华盛顿街从联合延伸至沙利文。 我认为 T47 提供了更有价值的连接，取代了旧的 91，但任何一种都可能是合理的。 请记住，萨默维尔已经在华盛顿街沿线增加了一些公交优先权和几个红绿灯。 计划增加更多 我们希望这将提供前往东萨默维尔站和沙利文站的连接，同时也是一条非常高效的路线。 因此，请记住这条路线的效率，而不仅仅是距离。我认为总体而言这可能是一条更有效的路线。 谢谢。 你做得很好，我希望你能在这方面快速前进。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢，汤姆。 我要去艾米丽·比特斯旁边。 对不起，艾米丽，我发音错误。 这是维图斯。 我真的很抱歉。 是的，好的。
[SPEAKER_21]: 所以我想谈谈89年。 我很感激他们康复了。 因为住在 Winter Hill 的人想去 我们不想步行去那里。 但我很失望，因为它仍然不是班次频繁的公共汽车，每半小时一班。 这意味着如果你错过了公共汽车，你将被困在那里一个小时。 我住的地方距离公交车站步行12分钟。 所以基本上我必须提前20分钟到达。 所以我想问为什么 如果你花时间把这辆巴士带回来 住在 Winter Hill 的每个人都想回来，因此不可能有更频繁的巴士来真正为社区服务。 谢谢。
[Unidentified]: 我的意思是，主要原因是资源限制。 我们与运营商合作的预算比我们目前要做的所有事情都要多 25%，而且我们的预算内有超过 60 辆公交车，比新冠疫情爆发前的预算还要多。 所以这已经是增加了，但我们还有很多事情要做。 这些就是我们正在平衡的不同权衡。 萨默维尔百老汇 (Summerville Broadway) 通过 T101 获得新的高频服务。 如果你输了89分，你可以把101分换成96分。 如果您只是失去了与我们新网络的连接，还有其他方法可以启用冗余行程转移。 谢谢你，梅丽莎。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 接下来我要去查尔斯那里。
[SPEAKER_09]: 晚安。 我只想说，我认为新地图比以前的版本有了巨大的改进，以前的版本看起来像是由一位顾问设计的，他从来不需要依赖公交车服务去任何地方。 也就是说，这是一个很大的进步。我会支持其他代表并请他们允许我认为拥有它很重要。 更多的公开会议，更多的时间来消化它们。 地图。 有人表示，他们从 2018 年开始就在做这件事。 在剑桥这里。 我们去年春天第一次听说这个计划。 打扰一下。 因此，我认为有更多机会征求公众意见并可能获得第三稿很重要。 评论员。 我住在西剑桥。 我非常感谢74的回归。 他提议大幅削减我们社区的服务。 拥有 74 路和 75 路意味着它将有可能用于中午的公共交通旅程，而不仅仅是高峰时段。 我看到伯灵顿-温彻斯特-沃尔伯特航线的航线正在改变。 这已经是很长的路了。 有时我自己也用它。 现在他要去Alewife。 我们将改道经梅德福前往戴维斯。 您将使本已很长的通勤时间增加 10 到 15 分钟。 我认为加入 Alewife 会更好。 另外两个非常快速的评论。 我认为如果你不将 71 号弯延伸到牛顿，你就会错过一个机会。 目前，如果您想从哈佛广场前往牛顿角。 您必须从 Watertown 换车或步行很长一段路，换车需要穿过主要街道。 我想现在就很简单了。 您没有无轨有轨电车只是延伸 71 号公路，绕牛顿角 (Newton Corner) 返回沃特敦 (Watertown)。 所以这是一个建议。 我认为你真的错过了一个机会。 另外，我知道一些剑桥居民提议将 83 号公路从 Range Avenue 延伸穿过 Alewife Parkway Bridge 到达 Alewife 的购物中心。 所以有一个这些是我的评论。 谢谢。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 非常感谢您的评论。 非常感谢。 嗯，我知道有些人想问一些后续问题，但我们会看看那些还没有机会发言的人。 第一。 今晚他们非常有耐心。 哦，艾莉森。
[SPEAKER_11]: 你好晚安。 一些评论。 首先，我要感谢你们恢复了 Heath Street 退伍军人管理局医院和努比亚广场之间的巴士服务。 这是非常重要的，完全消除它是疯狂的。 该路线到达的是 VA 医院。 在开幕式上，我认为 Josh 重点关注了 BMC，但我们也不要忘记 VA 医院。 我只是想非常具体地要求将各个路线图以 PDF 文件形式显示在您的网站上，因为这非常困难放大一些有多条路线的社区，看看这些行程使用了哪些特定街道。 两个后续问题。 现在 Heath Street 上的路线将是 41 并前往 JFK、UMass、这使得旅途很长。 您建议从布鲁克林村出发的另一条新路线 T12 也是一条很长的路线。 正如运营商所说，长途旅行会影响它们，而且显然也会影响可靠性。 所以我还是很担心这个问题。 谢谢。
[Unidentified]: 感谢您今晚的评论和反馈。 嗯，好吧，那我就和莎莎一起去吧。 怜悯，萨沙。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 现在我们可以听到你的声音了。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_12]: 出色地。 感谢大家为平衡这些多重问题所做的工作。 我今天的评论是关于布莱顿的，我沮丧地发现这座城市在很多方面都被排除在外。 我们搬到这里的唯一目的就是 501，但它被砍掉了。 据我了解，这是一辆快车，距离一些项目倡议还很远。 然而，即使在今天，我们仍然认为这辆巴士的服务很差。 因此，仅将其减少到高峰时间并远离周六。 从很多方面来说，它都将城市的这一部分与市中心隔离开来。 同样，后来成为 T15 的 65 也是从 Oak Square 上剪下来的。 我希望您能重新考虑按照上面的建议延长它并执行以下操作 通过医院区与拉格尔斯建立联系，否则医院区与布雷登的联系非常疏远。 然后我会谈论'86。 我知道我在那里发表了一些评论。 然而，我更愿意以有关巴士租赁计划的问题来结束我的思考。 你能发表评论吗 您打算如何做到这一点？ 据我所知，您正在向目前没有 CDL 并试图灵活地利用这个机会在城市周围创建高频路线的人们开放。 但具体数字是多少呢？ 你们现在有多少司机？ 您计划什么时候将这个数字增加 25%？ 一相、二相、三相有多少根导线，相数是多少？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 谢谢你的问题，这就是为什么我们没有每年的具体数字。 显然，我们知道我们现在有多少家运营商，我们需要多少家运营商来提供大流行前的服务，以及最终我们需要多少家运营商来提供我们在这个新网络上展示的服务。 确实如此。 如果你不介意的话，也许梅丽莎可以给你确切的数字，梅丽莎。 我面前没有这些，但实施整个网络所需的就是将我们今天拥有的运营商数量增加 50%。 这包括缩小我们目前拥有的数量与提供大流行前我们一直提供的服务水平所需的数量之间的差距。 所以我们 MBTA 正在采取许多举措来解决操作员招聘实践问题，并分析实际工作条件及其对运营商的影响。 人们渴望成为公交车运营商，因此他们会考虑从我们的招聘实践到工作本身及其所需内容的一切，以便他们能够弄清楚如何使这份工作更具吸引力。 对于有兴趣成为公交车运营商并最终雇用我们所需水平的员工的人来说，更容易获得。 我想我们在上次会议上向董事会提交了这些数字，但我不记得实际的数字了。 各位成员，你们中的大多数人都非常接近。
[Unidentified]: 因此，为了回到集会之前的状态，我们需要雇用大约 300 名公交运营商，然后重新设计公交网络。 运营商数量略多于 400 名，所以大约 700 名，我认为 50 名运营商是我们在过去五年中看到的。 达到我们现在的水平，然后包括我们想要增加的增长。 所以这是一个巨大的数字。 为了使这个职位更具吸引力，以便我们能够更具竞争力并找到使该计划成为现实所需的人才，我们正在考虑许多关于如何使该职位更具吸引力的不同想法以及其他一些不同的事情。
[Adam Hurtubise]: 正确的是，根据 Ron Wilson 的说法，我认为我们今天大约有 1,500 名操作员。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你们俩。 我会和凯伦谈谈，但我也想强调，如果您有任何意见，请使用评论表或在聊天中发帖，我们会阅读并保存在记录中。 所以，凯伦，我要取消你的静音。
[SPEAKER_29]: 你好，我叫凯伦·查韦斯，住在马萨诸塞州温思罗普。 我不确定梅丽莎·迪雷和道格·约翰逊从哪里得到的信息，但温思罗普运输委员会已不复存在。 该委员会的目标不是取消雪莉角鹿岛的一个巴士站，而是增加一个巴士站。 进入公共码头，以便人们可以使用渡轮。 我想这些人中没有人会在十二月寒冷的东北复活节那天从鹿岛步行到公共码头去赶公共汽车。 我认为如果他们这样做了，他们就会看到扩张的必要性 返回鹿岛的巴士路线，或者我们更了解的是，MWRA 站。 我很遗憾 MBTA 和 DOT 认为取消该特定巴士站是合适的。 我不住在雪莉角。 我不使用温思罗普的巴士服务。 但我对所有居住在雪莉角并使用此巴士服务的人们表示同情。 在寒冷的冬日走那么远几乎是不可能的。 我注意到他们已经将涨潮站移至了下车站，该站可能位于道路上方约四分之一英里处。 此外， 我认为当你谈论这座城市是什么样子时，你不会说它只是一个中途停留地。 这是你的球杆的宽度。 这不仅仅是途中的一站。 我希望 MBTA 和 DOT 能够回去看看这个问题。 我注意到我们有一个渡轮每天有几次去波士顿。 但这并不能弥补住在同一条路另一边的人们的痛苦。 谢谢。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 感谢您的评论。 我也想记下时间。 他们是8.48。 我们有 12 分钟的时间，但由于没有口译员，我们在 9 点钟暂停了这次会议。 我看到有五个人举起了手。 我们将在接下来的 12 分钟内讨论尽可能多的内容。 但我想分享的是，正如道格提到的，我们之后将举行一次后续会议，以便有更多机会提出问题和提供反馈。 以及评论表。 但我要停止说话并提出更多问题。 安妮塔，我现在要取消你的静音。
[Anita Nagem]: 你好。 我叫安妮塔·纳古姆。 抱歉，我住在梅德福，以前叫萨默维尔。 我想重复一下代表的意见。 迈克·康诺利. 他不是我的代表，但我对他的发言表示赞赏。 我认为继续下去是不可接受的 该计划包含许多变更，但没有对新提案进行充分和公正的评论期。 一些问题得到了解决，但也产生了许多其他问题。 我质疑在没有完整和公平的评论期的情况下进行是否能够真正满足联邦对公众参与的要求。 我很高兴 #89 和 #87 已在萨默维尔恢复。 我是一个非常关心此事的团体的一员，但我也非常关心梅德福发生的事情。 自上周四发布该计划以来，我已经与 200 多人进行了交谈。 由于我和邻居的努力，大约一半人知道了这个提议。 一半人从未听说过。 梅德福有两个主要问题。 首先，西梅德福的服务将非常少。 在北街以西的波士顿大道以及波士顿大道的高街，只有 80 路公交车，其班次最低，包括晚上 7 点后每 90 分钟一班。 96路公交车将不再以哈佛广场为终点站。 哈佛广场的服务中断是一个大问题。 有许多哈佛学生和工作人员居住在该地区。 此外，他并不认为哈佛广场是一个主要的公交枢纽。 许多人乘坐巴士前往哈佛，然后转乘其他线路。 剑桥医院的主院位于剑桥街， 从哈佛大学乘坐 69 路公交车即可到达。 对于我们这些住在梅德福的人来说，要去那里，我们必须乘坐三种交通工具，或者乘坐公共汽车，步行一两个街区，然后乘坐另一辆公共汽车。 这不是一个简单的旅程，也不会是一个简单的旅程。 一次转移就足够了。 您必须为需要前往剑桥医院的每个人保留 69 路公交车的畅通通道。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢。 这些都是我的评论。 非常感谢安妮塔。 今晚非常感激。 我要和席琳·帕克谈谈。
[Unidentified]: 帕克？ 非常感谢。
[SPEAKER_34]: 我也是西梅德福的居民，这与之前的评论非常吻合。 我只是想提一下，目前在梅德福广场和戴维斯广场之间运行并穿过西梅德福的 94 路公交车在提案中也很偏远，严重限制了西梅德福居民乘坐红线。 而且随着96号公路的改变，不再有 梅德福和哈佛广场之间的巴士服务，如前所述，是许多梅德福居民经常乘坐的公共汽车服务。 我想提出一个可能的解决方案来解决这两个问题。 他将尝试恢复目前终止于戴维斯广场的 94 路公交车路线，并将其延伸至哈佛广场。 因此，这将解决这两个问题不限制西梅德福居民进入红线，以及从梅德福进入哈佛广场。 因此，如果考虑这个选项，我将非常感激。 我只想再添加一条评论，仅此而已。 作为在梅德福和剑桥乘坐过公交车的人，我个人的观察是，服务梅德福的公交车更加陈旧，导致空气和噪音污染。 因此，我希望作为这一重大项目的一部分，服务梅德福路线的巴士改造也能得到认真考虑。 非常感谢。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 感谢您的评论。 我想今晚我们还有时间再问两个问题。 我看到了 FHSU 的一个人，我稍后会打电话给他，还有艾米丽。 我向今晚想要发表评论的任何人表示歉意，但我只是想指出这一点。 所以，FHSU，我要取消你的静音。
[SPEAKER_31]: 你好，你能听到我说话吗？
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 是的，我们可以。
[SPEAKER_31]: 是的。 只是一个简单的问题。 路线变更确实令人困惑。 那么请给我一个简短的总结。 此前，每个广场有五个公交车站。 那么，未来每个广场将停靠多少辆公交车呢？
[Unidentified]: 梅丽莎。 天哪，我已经就位了。 嗯，这取决于你去哪里。 因为从埃弗雷特广场您现在可以到达切尔西。 您可以到达东波士顿。 你可以去沙利文。 您可以到达许多不同的地方。 埃弗里特与许多不同的地方有更多的联系。 所以可以有多条路线，但这取决于你要去哪里。 所以我想就是这样。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 仍将有五条路线。 正如梅丽莎所说，新网络创建了新的连接。 因此，您将能够从埃弗雷特广场到达比目前更多的地方，并且您将拥有更频繁的巴士服务。 但经过埃弗雷特广场的路线绝对数量仍然是 5 条。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，道格拉斯。 谢谢你，梅丽莎。 艾米丽，我知道我有一个关于梅丽莎关于萨默维尔的问题的后续问题。 所以，艾米丽，你将是当晚的最后一个问题。 我愿意派自己去做这件事。
[SPEAKER_21]: 是的，非常感谢。 因此，我想继续坚持这样的想法：由于预算问题（无论是什么），Winter Hill 并不是 MBTA 的优先考虑事项。 这话实在不好听。 但我也想说声抱歉，仅此而已， 听到你附近的所有人都想上车真的很难。 这里错失了让人们下车上公交车的绝佳机会。 但没有什么好方法可以离开冬山去其他地方。 这真是太遗憾了。 我只是想，我觉得我是在代表很多人说话，这次重新设计虽然对很多地方都是改进，但对 Winter Hill 来说却不是改进。 这对北萨默维尔来说并不是一个进步。 对于北萨默维尔和东萨默维尔的环境正义社区来说，这并不是一个改善。 而且，你知道，我认为 MBT 必须与我们一起做得更好。 就这样。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_21]: 谢谢你，艾米丽。 我感谢您的评论，也感谢今晚每个人的评论，他们收到了非常深思熟虑的评论和非常好的问题。 道格，我现在就把这个交给你了。
[Adam Hurtubise]: 谢谢里根。
[MCM00001519_SPEAKER_10]: 感谢今晚加入我们的所有人。 我们非常感谢您参与这一过程。 您在整个过程中给我们的反馈确实使网络变得更好。 对于您之前在使用 Zoom 时遇到的问题以及一次会议的最大人数问题，我们再次表示诚挚的歉意，我们将再次举行会议。 我们将确保下次会议不再达到容量限制。 一旦会议日期选定，我们将在项目网站上注明这一点。 但现在，非常感谢大家参与其中。 我们非常感谢您抽出宝贵的时间并祝大家度过一个美好的夜晚。